displays double scrollbars
Categories
(Core :: Layout: Scrolling and Overflow, defect)
Tracking
()
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox-esr115 | --- | unaffected |
firefox-esr128 | --- | unaffected |
firefox134 | --- | wontfix |
firefox135 | --- | fixed |
firefox136 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: gintvidas123, Assigned: dshin)
References
(Regression)
Details
(Keywords: nightly-community, regression)
Attachments
(4 files)
223.92 KB,
image/jpeg
|
Details | |
284 bytes,
text/html
|
Details | |
48 bytes,
text/x-phabricator-request
|
RyanVM
:
approval-mozilla-beta+
|
Details | Review |
48 bytes,
text/x-phabricator-request
|
RyanVM
:
approval-mozilla-beta+
|
Details | Review |
User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:134.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/134.0
Steps to reproduce:
After updating to Firefox version 134.0 on my Windows computer, I noticed that the website https://misterjuggler.com/ displays double scrollbars. This issue did not exist in the previous version of Firefox.
Actual results:
I noticed that the website https://misterjuggler.com/ displays double scrollbars.
Expected results:
I should have seen one scroll, but I see double scroll in website https://misterjuggler.com/
Updated•1 month ago
|
Comment 1•1 month ago
|
||
The Bugbug bot thinks this bug should belong to the 'Core::Layout: Scrolling and Overflow' component, and is moving the bug to that component. Please correct in case you think the bot is wrong.
![]() |
||
Comment 2•1 month ago
|
||
Regression window:
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/pushloghtml?fromchange=dd8c7c0aa4dfd22d8b4d86212269360a1d2d6550&tochange=e2242ed908c0f7637c2b9277a674d5d0e1bcd09f
Comment 3•1 month ago
|
||
:dshin, since you are the author of the regressor, bug 1931466, could you take a look? Also, could you set the severity field?
For more information, please visit BugBot documentation.
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•1 month ago
|
||
Empty span with newline causes the text to be located somewhere far down, and that is becoming part of the containing div's scrollable overflow:
Block(div id=dut)(0)@7e4ae9dcde50 parent=7e4ae9dcdba8 (x=0, y=-6000, w=6000, h=6000) ink-overflow=(x=0, y=0, w=6000, h=61740) scr-overflow=(x=0, y=0, w=6000, h=61740) [content=7e4ae7f07550] [cs=7e4aea7d0f08:-moz-scrolled-content] <
line@7e4ae9dce250 count=1 state=block,clean,prevmarginclean,not-impacted,not-wrapped,no-break,clear-before:none,clear-after:none(x=0, y=0, w=6000, h=6000) in-flow-scr-overflow=(x=0, y=0, w=6000, h=6000) <
Block(div id=filler)(1)@7e4ae9dcdf18 parent=7e4ae9dcde50 next=7e4ae9dcdfe0 (x=0, y=0, w=6000, h=6000) [content=7e4ae7f075e0] [cs=7e4aea7d1008] <
>
>
line@7e4ae9dce2a0 count=1 state=block,clean,prevmarginclean,not-impacted,not-wrapped,no-break,clear-before:none,clear-after:none(x=0, y=6000, w=6000, h=0) ink-overflow=(x=0, y=6000, w=6000, h=55740) scr-overflow=(x=0, y=6000, w=6000, h=55740) in-flow-scr-overflow=(x=0, y=6000, w=6000, h=0) <
Block(div)(3)@7e4ae9dcdfe0 parent=7e4ae9dcde50 (x=0, y=6000, w=6000, h=0) ink-overflow=(x=0, y=0, w=6000, h=55740) scr-overflow=(x=0, y=0, w=6000, h=55740) [content=7e4ae7f07670] [cs=7e4aea7d0508] <
line@7e4ae9dce200 count=1 state=inline,clean,prevmarginclean,not-impacted,not-wrapped,no-break,clear-before:none,clear-after:none(x=0, y=0, w=0, h=0) ink-overflow=(x=0, y=0, w=0, h=0) scr-overflow=(x=0, y=55740, w=0, h=0) <
Inline(span)(0)@7e4ae9dce0a8 parent=7e4ae9dcdfe0 (x=0, y=0, w=0, h=0) scr-overflow=(x=0, y=55740, w=0, h=0) [content=7e4ae7f07700] [cs=7e4aea7d0208] <
Text(0)"\n\n"@7e4ae9dce160 parent=7e4ae9dce0a8 (x=0, y=55740, w=0, h=0) [content=7e4ae7f05180] [cs=7e4aea7d1108:-moz-text] [run=0][0,2,T]
>
>
>
>
>
Assignee | ||
Updated•1 month ago
|
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•1 month ago
|
||
IsValidOverflowRect
was originally introduced to consider only zero-sized
rects that are located at origin to be invalid in Bug 1800907. However,
it doesn't make sense for a zero-sized rect located away from origin to
contribute to overflow.
Updated•1 month ago
|
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•1 month ago
|
||
Previous changeset caused assertions in text-indent-with-absolute-pos-child.html
,
because when text-indent
is negative, psd->mICoord - psd->mIStart
, used to
compute the overflow rect of the line box, would end up being negative.
Prior to the previous patch, we'd add the overflow of the placeholder box, which
would be zero-sized, but offset by psd->mICoord, which would be considered valid,
thus adding to the negative-sized overflow rect and covering it up.
Depends on D234097
Updated•1 month ago
|
Comment 9•1 month ago
|
||
bugherder |
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/dd59e15ede57
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/af21fd2211a6
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/109dd7df5677
Updated•1 month ago
|
Comment 11•1 month ago
|
||
The patch landed in nightly and beta is affected.
:dshin, is this bug important enough to require an uplift?
- If yes, please nominate the patch for beta approval.
- If no, please set
status-firefox135
towontfix
.
For more information, please visit BugBot documentation.
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•28 days ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9459235 [details]
Bug 1940938: Expand definition of Invalid overflow rect to be zero-sized rects that are offset from origin as well. r=#layout
Beta/Release Uplift Approval Request
- User impact if declined/Reason for urgency: Potential scrolling jank due to unexpected multiple scrollbars on real websites
- Is this code covered by automated tests?: Yes
- Has the fix been verified in Nightly?: Yes
- Needs manual test from QE?: No
- If yes, steps to reproduce: If needed, check reporter's website for double scrollbars. More noticeable on platforms with classic (Non-overlay) scrollbars.
- List of other uplifts needed: None
- Risk to taking this patch: Low
- Why is the change risky/not risky? (and alternatives if risky): Small change in logic for determining empty overflow based by disregarding its positioning.
- String changes made/needed:
- Is Android affected?: Yes
Comment 13•28 days ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9459235 [details]
Bug 1940938: Expand definition of Invalid overflow rect to be zero-sized rects that are offset from origin as well. r=#layout
Looks like the approval request flag didn't actually get set.
Comment 14•28 days ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9459235 [details]
Bug 1940938: Expand definition of Invalid overflow rect to be zero-sized rects that are offset from origin as well. r=#layout
Approved for 135.0b9.
Updated•28 days ago
|
Updated•28 days ago
|
Comment 15•28 days ago
|
||
uplift |
Description
•