Closed
Bug 194135
Opened 22 years ago
Closed 16 years ago
address matching should check "additional email" fields
Categories
(SeaMonkey :: MailNews: Address Book & Contacts, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
seamonkey2.0a2
People
(Reporter: der1way, Unassigned)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [Fixed by bug 450149])
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030210
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030210
For junk mail, filters and view "people I know" the address matching does not
check "additional email" fields in the address book.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create an address book entry, with main and additional email addresses.
2. Receive mail from the "additional" address
3. See message filters based on "is in personal address book" fail.
4. See that junk mail does not consider it from known addresses.
5. See it disappear when doing view "people I know"
Actual Results:
address is not considered known
Expected Results:
address should be treated as known.
I view this and the case sensitivity of address matching to make the current
facility worse than what I was doing before - to use a long list to catch all
the knowns, which at least was case insensitive.
Comment 1•22 years ago
|
||
yes this affects also filtering based on an address book, and the case
sensitivety makes things work a lot worst!
BTW i guess it affects all hardware architectures and all the OSs as this does
the same for me on Mozilla 1.3.0 on Linux and FreeBSD
Comment 2•22 years ago
|
||
I confirm that this bug exists on Mac OS X Moz 1.3
Comment 3•22 years ago
|
||
Yes. When processing junk mail, the additional email address is not checked. It
also happens that the email addresses are case sensitive, when processing junk
mail, even with the main email address.
Updated•20 years ago
|
Product: Browser → Seamonkey
Updated•20 years ago
|
Assignee: sspitzer → mail
Comment 5•17 years ago
|
||
works for filters so should also work for junk processing.
WFM. Please reopen if you see otherwise
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 17 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
Sorry, no it does NOT work in filters, in thunderbird 2.0.0.6.
If you make a rule by saying "FROM: is in my address book", the "additional email" field does not cause a match for incoming email messages! You have to have a whole extra address book entry, for each address, as "additional address" is never checked.
What version are you running?
Resolution: WORKSFORME → INCOMPLETE
Comment 7•17 years ago
|
||
is this the issue that the check for "additional address" is case sensitive, but the primary address check is case-insensitive?
Comment 8•17 years ago
|
||
Comment 9•17 years ago
|
||
David, I vaguely recall that you or Mark said the "normal" email address is stored in a second location in the card for comparisons, but "additional" email doesn't have that.
Comment 10•17 years ago
|
||
yes, right, as I remember it, the normal email address is stored twice; the second version is forced to lower case, and we use that for comparisions, after forcing the address we're looking for to lower case as well. We don't do that for the "additional" e-mail address.
Reporter | ||
Comment 11•17 years ago
|
||
Yes, sorry, you are right! Now days it works, except when there are letter case differences.
Comment 12•17 years ago
|
||
Also, perhaps the meaning of "Additional email" could be changed to "Additionel email(s)" to allow specifying (there are few people out there who have more than two email addresses. Often they use only one or two of them, but they have some "history" - each new employer mean new email address for them)
Updated•17 years ago
|
Status: REOPENED → NEW
QA Contact: nbaca → addressbook
Comment 13•16 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #12)
I tend to disagree with the statement, that only few people have more
than two email addresses. I am in frequent contact with people, who use both their private and their business email address for communication. This is certainly not an uncommon behaviour.
Comment 14•16 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #13)
Sorry - it's Monday obviously (being confused with numbers). Please disregard my comment.
Comment 15•16 years ago
|
||
The remaining case sensitivity issue has been fixed by bug 450149 (a while ago) and is in the SeaMonkey 2.x preview builds.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 17 years ago → 16 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Whiteboard: [Fixed by bug 450149]
Target Milestone: --- → seamonkey2.0a2
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•