2.72 - 2.52% damp complicated.jsdebugger.open.DAMP / damp custom.jsdebugger.open.DAMP (Windows) regression on Fri January 17 2025
Categories
(DevTools :: Debugger, defect)
Tracking
(firefox-esr128 unaffected, firefox134 unaffected, firefox135 unaffected, firefox136 affected)
| Tracking | Status | |
|---|---|---|
| firefox-esr128 | --- | unaffected |
| firefox134 | --- | unaffected |
| firefox135 | --- | unaffected |
| firefox136 | --- | affected |
People
(Reporter: intermittent-bug-filer, Unassigned)
References
(Regression)
Details
(4 keywords)
Perfherder has detected a devtools performance regression from push 3372d449dbfde6a686ed07c7d23ba8c5740b1431. As author of one of the patches included in that push, we need your help to address this regression.
Regressions:
| Ratio | Test | Platform | Options | Absolute values (old vs new) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3% | damp complicated.jsdebugger.open.DAMP | windows11-64-shippable-qr | e10s fission stylo webrender | 321.93 -> 330.70 |
| 3% | damp custom.jsdebugger.open.DAMP | windows11-64-shippable-qr | e10s fission stylo webrender | 385.17 -> 394.88 |
Details of the alert can be found in the alert summary, including links to graphs and comparisons for each of the affected tests. Please follow our guide to handling regression bugs and let us know your plans within 3 business days, or the patch(es) may be backed out in accordance with our regression policy.
If you need the profiling jobs you can trigger them yourself from treeherder job view or ask a sheriff to do that for you.
You can run all of these tests on try with ./mach try perf --alert 43426
The following documentation link provides more information about this command.
For more information on performance sheriffing please see our FAQ.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to reach out to afinder@mozilla.com.
|
||
Updated•11 months ago
|
|
||
Comment 1•11 months ago
|
||
Set release status flags based on info from the regressing bug 1862157
|
||
Comment 2•11 months ago
|
||
Wontfix for the same reason as bug 1942774 comment 2.
Description
•