196170 - browser crash upon opening page

Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 92425

(Core :: DOM: Navigation, defect)

Description

[Will Taylor]

User-Agent:       Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030210
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030210

The page at http://www.aria-nightclub.com/ crashes the browser.  It comes up and
flashes for a second, then crashes.  The page is a mostly a javascript broser
check that pops up a new window.

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Using Mozilla 1.3b 2003021008 bring up this url http://www.aria-nightclub.com/
2. Watch the browser crash
Actual Results:  
Browser crash

Expected Results:  
Display the page and then pop up a new window

Comment 1

[Will Taylor]

Attachment: Browser crash test case

This is the source of the page that crashes the browser

Comment 2

[Olivier Cahagne]

wfm using build 2003030408 on Win2k + Flash 6.0r65.
Can you post Talkback ID for this crash "mozilla/bin/components/talkback.exe" ?

Comment 3

[Will Taylor]

I have no Talkback ID...it isn't capturing the crash.  I just checked and I have
Talkback turned on, but no dice.  Suggestions?  Anything else I can do to help?

Comment 4

[MrJeff]

Attachment: Minimal example

This is a minimal example of this bug

Comment 5

[MrJeff]

I have just created and attached a minimal test example.
I get the same problem (browsers closes, no talkback)
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030210

Comment 6

[MrJeff]

Catching this bug has proved very hard. By running multiple web pages, and
entering random bits of other (nice simple valid) HTML into the minimal example
I can occasionally cause a crash. Such an example is at TB17795193W

Comment 7

[Peter Lubczynski]

Attachment: stack from MSDEV for last testcase

Here's the stack for that last testcase from msdev. It's a bit different than
what talkback reports and you can see the recursion better. I think this may be
another dup of bug 92425.

Comment 8

[Peter Lubczynski]

-->docshell

Comment 9

[Adam Lock]

Duping against bug 92425. Obviously something has changed recently which has
caused this regression.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 92425 ***