Closed Bug 1972342 Opened 9 months ago Closed 8 months ago

Web appearance using missing CSS variable --in-content-box-background-color

Categories

(Toolkit :: Preferences, defect, P3)

defect

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
143 Branch
Tracking Status
firefox-esr115 --- unaffected
firefox-esr128 --- unaffected
firefox-esr140 --- fixed
firefox139 --- wontfix
firefox140 --- wontfix
firefox141 --- wontfix
firefox142 --- wontfix
firefox143 --- fixed

People

(Reporter: henry-x, Assigned: jqln, Mentored)

References

(Regression)

Details

(Keywords: good-first-bug, regression, Whiteboard: [lang=css] [recomp])

Attachments

(1 file)

After the changes in bug 1865371, .web-appearance-choice should be using --background-color-box, but it is still using --in-content-box-background-color. This has a noticeable effect in the dark theme.

Set release status flags based on info from the regressing bug 1865371

Mentor: akulyk
Severity: -- → S4
Keywords: good-first-bug
Priority: -- → P3
Whiteboard: [lang=css] [recomp]
Assignee: nobody → jacqueline.amherst
Attachment #9499239 - Attachment description: WIP: Bug 1972342 - change --in-content-box-background-color to --background-color-box → Bug 1972342 - change --in-content-box-background-color to --background-color-box r?akulyk!
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Pushed by akulyk@mozilla.com: https://github.com/mozilla-firefox/firefox/commit/02cf64446221 https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/f16bd398c6e7 change --in-content-box-background-color to --background-color-box r=akulyk,settings-reviewers,desktop-theme-reviewers,hjones
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 8 months ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → 143 Branch

Since nightly and release are affected, beta will likely be affected too.
For more information, please visit BugBot documentation.

The patch landed in nightly and beta is affected.
:jacqueline.amherst, is this bug important enough to require an uplift?

For more information, please visit BugBot documentation.

Flags: needinfo?(jacqueline.amherst)

This isn’t critical for 142, would you mind setting status-firefox142 to wontfix? I don't have permission to do it!

Flags: needinfo?(jacqueline.amherst) → needinfo?(akulyk)
Flags: needinfo?(akulyk)
QA Whiteboard: [qa-triage-done-c144/b143]

Comment on attachment 9499239 [details]
Bug 1972342 - change --in-content-box-background-color to --background-color-box r?akulyk!

ESR Uplift Approval Request

  • If this is not a sec:{high,crit} bug, please state case for ESR consideration: This is a regression from ESR 128. This also effects Tor Browser, which uses the web-appearance-choice class. I know ESR 140 was just marked as wontfix, but I hope you might reconsider.
  • User impact if declined: The website appearance selector background is darker than intended in the dark theme.
  • Fix Landed on Version: 143
  • Risk to taking this patch: Low
  • Why is the change risky/not risky? (and alternatives if risky): Only changes one line of CSS.
Attachment #9499239 - Flags: approval-mozilla-esr140?

(In reply to Henry Wilkes (they/them) [:henry-x] from comment #8)

This is a regression from ESR 128

Actually, this is not true. ESR 128 used --in-content-box-background-color, rather than --in-content-box-background, which was also undefined.

Comment on attachment 9499239 [details]
Bug 1972342 - change --in-content-box-background-color to --background-color-box r?akulyk!

Approved for 140.3esr.

Attachment #9499239 - Flags: approval-mozilla-esr140? → approval-mozilla-esr140+
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: