Compilation failure for riscv64 JIT: no member named 'pushFrameDescriptor' in 'js::jit::MacroAssembler' at jit/riscv64/SharedICHelpers-riscv64-inl.h
Categories
(Core :: JavaScript Engine: JIT, defect, P5)
Tracking
()
| Tracking | Status | |
|---|---|---|
| firefox-esr115 | --- | unaffected |
| firefox-esr128 | --- | unaffected |
| firefox-esr140 | --- | unaffected |
| firefox140 | --- | unaffected |
| firefox141 | --- | unaffected |
| firefox142 | --- | unaffected |
| firefox143 | --- | unaffected |
| firefox144 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: csmantle, Assigned: csmantle)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug, Regression)
Details
(Keywords: regression)
Attachments
(2 files)
Revision https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D251070 unified various MacroAssembler::push* family of methods into a single MacroAssembler::push and updated related calls. However, one call to the former methods was left unchanged, causing this compliation failure.
| Assignee | ||
Updated•1 year ago
|
| Assignee | ||
Comment 1•1 year ago
|
||
Comment 2•1 year ago
|
||
:iain, since you are the author of the regressor, bug 1960433, could you take a look? Also, could you set the severity field?
For more information, please visit BugBot documentation.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 3•1 year ago
|
||
Updated•1 year ago
|
Updated•1 year ago
|
Comment 5•1 year ago
|
||
| bugherder | ||
Comment 6•1 year ago
|
||
Set release status flags based on info from the regressing bug 1960433
| Assignee | ||
Comment 7•1 year ago
|
||
We may need to revert this bug as well together with bug 1960433.
Comment 10•1 year ago
|
||
Backout merged to central: https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/7f609608e697
Updated•1 year ago
|
Comment 11•1 year ago
|
||
There is an r+ patch which didn't land and no activity in this bug for 2 weeks.
:csmantle, could you have a look please?
If you still have some work to do, you can add an action "Plan Changes" in Phabricator.
For more information, please visit BugBot documentation.
Updated•1 year ago
|
| Assignee | ||
Comment 12•1 year ago
|
||
The bot's concerns don't seem valid -- I think this bug needs to be kept open as long as bug 1960433 is still in flight.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 13•1 year ago
|
||
Iain, should we also reapply this patch to main?
Updated•1 year ago
|
Comment 14•1 year ago
|
||
Comment 15•1 year ago
|
||
| bugherder | ||
Updated•1 year ago
|
Updated•1 year ago
|
Description
•