Closed
Bug 198510
Opened 23 years ago
Closed 22 years ago
Image not automatically refreshing when changing combobox value with arrow keys
Categories
(Core :: DOM: Events, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 126379
People
(Reporter: bugzilla, Assigned: saari)
References
()
Details
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4a) Gecko/20030318
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4a) Gecko/20030318
As you can see on the URL, I've got a SELECT and an IMG. When the SELECT
changes, a cookie is set and the IMG is updated. This event is caught using
SELECT's ONCHANGE property. When I use the mouse to select another option, the
image is repainted, but when I do so using the arrow keys, the cookie is set,
and the image source is updated but not repainted. When another window gains
focus and I go back to the page, the image is updated.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Surf to URL
2. Select another option in the combobox
3. Compare behavior of the thumbnail when using arrow keys or mouse to select option
Actual Results:
Thumbnail is not updated when using arrow keys
Expected Results:
Repaint the thumbnail in both cases
Comment 1•23 years ago
|
||
using the arrow keys to change the option does not fire onChange until the
<select> loses focus. This is done because keyboard-only users typically do not
want onchange firing until they have actually made a selection.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 126379 ***
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
| Reporter | ||
Comment 2•23 years ago
|
||
Afaik that only applies when the combobox is expanded and not when it only
displays the selected option.
Sorry if I'm nagging, it just seems odd to me...
Status: RESOLVED → UNCONFIRMED
Resolution: DUPLICATE → ---
Comment 3•22 years ago
|
||
Boris did explain it: the onchange isn't fired when changing the selection with
the keyboard until it loses focus. It doesn't matter if it is expanded or not.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 126379 ***
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago → 22 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
| Reporter | ||
Comment 4•22 years ago
|
||
Thanks, I understand; I must've misinterpreted the dealie at the time.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•