Preload scripts are not run for windows opened with window.open() (without a URL argument)
Categories
(Remote Protocol :: WebDriver BiDi, defect, P3)
Tracking
(firefox148 fixed)
| Tracking | Status | |
|---|---|---|
| firefox148 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: hbenl, Assigned: vhilla)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [webdriver:m18][webdriver:external])
See this comment.
Bug 1988202 may be related since it also shows a different behavior for window.open() vs. window.open("about:blank").
|
Reporter | |
Comment 1•4 months ago
|
||
Preload scripts are also not run for dynamically added iframes, which is why this Playwright test is currently failing.
|
|
Reporter | |
Comment 2•4 months ago
|
||
(In reply to Holger Benl [:hbenl] from comment #1)
Preload scripts are also not run for dynamically added iframes, which is why this Playwright test is currently failing.
I was wrong about this: the preload scripts are also run for dynamically added iframes, the Playwright test is failing for a different reason that I'm still investigating.
|
||
Updated•3 months ago
|
|
||
Comment 3•3 months ago
|
||
The severity field is not set for this bug.
:whimboo, could you have a look please?
For more information, please visit BugBot documentation.
|
|
||
Comment 4•3 months ago
|
||
Sasha, will take a look until next week's meeting.
|
||
Comment 5•3 months ago
|
||
The issue is really with document-element-inserted notification not being dispatched, but seems like bug 543435 fixes it and then preload scripts are executed (I tested it with the attached patches). But the timing issue from bug 1985997 is still present.
|
|
||
Updated•2 months ago
|
|
|
||
Comment 6•1 month ago
|
||
(In reply to Alexandra Borovova [:Sasha] from comment #5)
The issue is really with
document-element-insertednotification not being dispatched, but seems like bug 543435 fixes it and then preload scripts are executed (I tested it with the attached patches). But the timing issue from bug 1985997 is still present.
Sasha, did you mean to add bug 1985997 to the dependency list for this bug or isn't it a hard blocker because it's under the see also section?
|
|
||
Comment 7•1 month ago
|
||
Sasha, did you mean to add bug 1985997 to the dependency list for this bug or isn't it a hard blocker because it's under the see also section?
bug 543435 was the only blocker. I've just retested it and can not reproduce it anymore. So I think we can consider it fixed.
|
|
||
Comment 8•1 month ago
|
||
Bug 543435 is going to be backed out from beta. So lets mark it fixed for 148 instead.
|
|
||
Updated•1 month ago
|
Description
•