Perma browser/extensions/webcompat/tests/browser/browser_smartblockembeds.js | browser/extensions/webcompat/tests/browser/browser_smartblockembeds.js | test_smartblock_embed_replaced - A promise chain failed when Gecko 148 merges to beta on 2026-02-23
Categories
(Firefox :: Address Bar, defect, P1)
Tracking
()
| Tracking | Status | |
|---|---|---|
| firefox-esr115 | --- | unaffected |
| firefox-esr140 | --- | unaffected |
| firefox147 | --- | unaffected |
| firefox148 | + | fixed |
| firefox149 | + | fixed |
People
(Reporter: agoloman, Assigned: daleharvey)
References
(Regression)
Details
(Keywords: regression, Whiteboard: [sng])
Attachments
(4 files)
|
48 bytes,
text/x-phabricator-request
|
Details | Review | |
|
48 bytes,
text/x-phabricator-request
|
Details | Review | |
|
48 bytes,
text/x-phabricator-request
|
phab-bot
:
approval-mozilla-beta+
|
Details | Review |
|
48 bytes,
text/x-phabricator-request
|
phab-bot
:
approval-mozilla-beta+
|
Details | Review |
| Assignee | ||
Updated•1 month ago
|
| Assignee | ||
Comment 1•1 month ago
|
||
This is a confusing one, its causing a failure while trustpanel is disabled and the code thats being called is behind an early return that checks if the feature is enabled. Not sure at what point in the test run that test preferences are set but should have it figured out for tomorrow
Updated•1 month ago
|
| Assignee | ||
Comment 2•1 month ago
|
||
The patch is not working.. The failure line changed:
browser/extensions/webcompat/tests/browser/browser_smartblockembeds.js | test_smartblock_embed_replaced - A promise chain failed to handle a rejection: can't access property "scheme", uri is null - stack: formatURIForDisplay@resource://gre/modules/BrowserUtils.sys.mjs
| Assignee | ||
Comment 7•1 month ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 8•1 month ago
|
||
Ugh, theres another entry point they can hit when disabled, new patch up.
Comment 9•1 month ago
•
|
||
This is actually affecting 148 and was present in the last simulation of the cycle before the merge to beta. Beta link here and an uplift of the fix would be welcome.
Updated•1 month ago
|
| Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment 11•1 month ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Updated•1 month ago
|
Updated•1 month ago
|
Comment 12•1 month ago
|
||
| bugherder | ||
Comment 13•1 month ago
|
||
:daleharvey, please add beta uplift requests when you have a moment.
As mentioned in Comment 9, Fx148 is affected since the regressor landed during Fx148 nightly.
Comment 14•1 month ago
|
||
firefox-release Uplift Approval Request
- User impact if declined: This leaves functionality that was disabled in release to still run, there shouldnt be any user impact but it does break release tests
- Code covered by automated testing: yes
- Fix verified in Nightly: yes
- Needs manual QE test: no
- Steps to reproduce for manual QE testing:
- Risk associated with taking this patch: low
- Explanation of risk level: Mostly test only fix
- String changes made/needed: None
- Is Android affected?: yes
| Assignee | ||
Comment 15•1 month ago
|
||
Original Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D279477
Comment 16•1 month ago
|
||
firefox-beta Uplift Approval Request
- User impact if declined: This leaves functionality that was disabled in release to still run, there shouldnt be any user impact but it does break release tests
- Code covered by automated testing: yes
- Fix verified in Nightly: no
- Needs manual QE test: no
- Steps to reproduce for manual QE testing:
- Risk associated with taking this patch: low
- Explanation of risk level: Mostly test only fix
- String changes made/needed: N/A
- Is Android affected?: no
| Assignee | ||
Comment 17•1 month ago
|
||
Original Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D279078
| Assignee | ||
Comment 18•1 month ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9538612 [details]
Bug 2010003 - Ignore events while trustpanel is disabled.
Beta/Release Uplift Approval Request
- User impact if declined/Reason for urgency:
- Is this code covered by automated tests?: Yes
- Has the fix been verified in Nightly?: Yes
- Needs manual test from QE?: Yes
- If yes, steps to reproduce:
- List of other uplifts needed: None
- Risk to taking this patch: Low
- Why is the change risky/not risky? (and alternatives if risky):
- String changes made/needed:
- Is Android affected?: Yes
Updated•1 month ago
|
Updated•1 month ago
|
Updated•1 month ago
|
Comment 19•1 month ago
|
||
| uplift | ||
Description
•