CFCA: reporting delayed when handling incident bug #2006333
Categories
(CA Program :: CA Certificate Compliance, task)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
People
(Reporter: songxinlei, Assigned: songxinlei)
Details
(Whiteboard: [ca-compliance] [policy-failure])
User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/143.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Steps to reproduce:
Preliminary Incident Report
Summary
- Incident description: During handling Bug #2006333, due to misconception of the CCADB Incident Reporting Guidelines, the full incident report was not submitted within 14 days and delayed for 14 days.
- Relevant policies: CCADB Incident Reporting Guidelines, While Full Incident Reports SHOULD be posted as soon as possible, they MUST be posted within 14 days of the incident’s initial disclosure.
- Source of incident disclosure: Third Party Reported on Bug #2006333
Updated•8 months ago
|
Hi,
We're preparing the Full Incident Report. Will Update it soon.
Full Incident Report
Summary
- CA Owner CCADB unique ID: A000272
- Incident description: During handling Bug #2006333, due to misconception of the CCADB Incident Reporting Guidelines, the full incident report was not submitted within 14 days and delayed for 14 days.
- Timeline summary:
- Non-compliance start date: 2026-01-13 (the delayed full report publish date)
- Non-compliance identified date: 2026-01-13
- Non-compliance end date: 2026-01-15 (this bug's filing date)
- Relevant policies: CCADB Incident Reporting Guidelines, "While Full Incident Reports SHOULD be posted as soon as possible, they MUST be posted within 14 days of the incident’s initial disclosure."
- Source of incident disclosure: Third Party Reported in Bug #2006333
Impact
- Total number of certificates: N/A
- Total number of "remaining valid" certificates: N/A
- Affected certificate types: N/A
- Incident heuristic: N/A
- Was issuance stopped in response to this incident, and why or why not?: N/A
- Analysis: N/A
- Additional considerations: N/A
Timeline
All times are in UTC+8 (China Standard Time)
- 2025-12-16: Bug #2006333 Created and Preliminary Incident Report posted
- 2025-12-17 11:42: Certificates from the CPR revoked
- 2025-12-22 15:54: 27 more non-compliant EV certificates identified
- 2025-12-29 09:19: All affected certificates revoked
- 2026-01-05 17:42: CFCA replied the comment and awared of this violation in bug #2009134 and bug #2006333
- 2026-01-13 01:37: Community member comments about delay of Full Incident Report
- 2026-01-13 23:05: Full Incident Report posted
- 2026-01-15 17:40: This bug filed.
Related Incidents
| Bug | Date | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 2008972 | 2026-01-08 | Disig: Delayed Full Incident Report |
| 2004300 | 2025-12-05 | Telia: Delayed submission of preliminary audit incident report |
| 1937210 | 2024-12-14 | DigiCert: Late incident report for bug 1925106 |
| 1893546 | 2024-04-26 | e-commerce monitoring gmbh: failure to follow incident report requirements |
| 1890901 | 2024-04-11 | Entrust: Delayed incident report - CPS typographical (text placement) error |
| 2009134 | 2025-12-16 | CFCA: reporting delayed when handling incident bug #2005399 CA Certificate Compliance |
Root Cause Analysis
Contributing Factor #1: missing description of full reporting requirements in internal incident handling plan
- Description: Missed full reporting requirements during handling incidents.
- Timeline:
- 2024-4-20: Incident Handling Guideline was ammended, adding description of timeline requirements, but missed submission of full reporting requirements.
- Detection: After comparing our internal incident handling plan with CCADB text, we found there missed the full reporting requirements.
- Interaction with other factors: Although our compliance team are familiar with CCADB requirements, but will mainly refer to our internal incident handling plan for guidance.
- Root Cause Analysis methodology used: 5-Whys, Document Review
Lessons Learned
- What went well: N/A
- What didn’t go well: N/A
- Where we got lucky: N/A
- Additional: N/A
Action Items
| Action Item | Kind | Corresponding Root Cause(s) | Evaluation Criteria | Due Date | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Update internal incident handling plan to fully align with community requiremennts | Prevent | Root Cause #1 | internal incident handling plan updated and reviewd | 2026-02-14 | Ongoing |
Appendix
N/A
Hi,
We're still monitoring this bug, if there're no further questions, we'll submit a closure report.
Hi, we've finalized the draft Incident Handling Standards for review. Will update the status later.
Hi,
We completed the Action Items by algning our internal Incident Handling Guidelines with BR and CCADB's Incident Reporting Guidelines. Here're the Updated Action Items:
Action Items
| Action Item | Kind | Corresponding Root Cause(s) | Evaluation Criteria | Due Date | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Update internal incident handling plan to fully align with community requiremennts | Prevent | Root Cause #1/#2 | internal incident handling plan updated and reviewd | 2026-02-14 | completed |
Report Closure Summary
- Incident description: During handling Bug #2006333, due to misconception of the CCADB Incident Reporting Guidelines, the full incident report was not submitted within 14 days and delayed for 14 days.
- Incident Root Cause(s): Missing description of full reporting requirements in internal incident handling plan
- Remediation description: Update internal incident handling plan to fully align with community requiremennts
- Commitment summary: We have established and improved internal incident handling guidelines. We will continue to follow up on changes, update internal guidelines in a timely manner, and conduct training on relevant changes.
All Action Items disclosed in this report have been completed as described, and we request its closure.
Comment 7•7 months ago
|
||
This is a final call for comments or questions on this Incident Report.
Otherwise, it will be closed on approximately 2026-02-18.
Updated•6 months ago
|
Description
•