User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 When I sent messages that I composed using the HTML editor to folks who are not in my book as happy HTML recipients, I get the (expected) message: "You used Formatting (e.g., Colors) that will not be converted to plain text". This message could be more specific, by telling the user exactly what formatting (e.g., Italics or Colors or fonts...) caused the problem. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. I'm interested in hacking on Mozilla. I've got about 200,000 lines of C on Unix under my belt, and about 30,000 lines of C++. I have the O'Reilly Mozilla book, and would like to apply some of it to a Real Problem. I would like to try to improve this message (it seems like a self-contained task), but I first want to check with y'all whether this enhancement would be of interest and whether, if I made it, it would stand much of a chance of being incorporated into Mozilla. Thanks!
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 246758 ***
This is not a dup. Steve, I like your suggestion. I wrote the current code and tried to do what you suggest, to some extend, already, the code knows different kinds of formatting: - no formatting (only linebreaks) - formatting that can be easily converted while preserving layout mostly (indention, bulleted lists etc.) - IIRC: Formatting that can be represented in plaintext, but will look differently (tables etc.) - Presentational formatting that can not be converted, like colors and font sizes I tried to convey that using different icons in the dialog, but that wasn't acceppted IIRC. IIRC I do convey it using the text (or was that ripped out as well?). If you can figure out a nice way and get buy-in in advance from the mailnews owners (mainly ducarroz here, I'm not one of them), I'm all for it. So, please make a concrete suggestion what you'd like to do look for in code, how to present it to the user, how to word things.
> what you'd like to do look for in code I mean which HTML tags assigning bug to you.
No response. WONTFIX.