prototype a navigation benchmark test
Categories
(Testing :: Performance, enhancement, P3)
Tracking
(firefox154 fixed)
| Tracking | Status | |
|---|---|---|
| firefox154 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: kshampur, Assigned: kshampur)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug)
Details
(Whiteboard: [fxp][vision][est-4w])
Attachments
(1 file, 1 external file)
|
112.96 KB,
image/png
|
Details |
I think this should be done in the mozperftest harness
This bug will just track that attempt/proof-of-concept and provide some Try runs etc before we expand on the idea.
The idea is similar to the existing navigation tests in raptor however we do this instead by actually "navigating" with things like clicking links rather than explicitly changing URL's
| Assignee | ||
Comment 1•6 months ago
|
||
correction to comment 0... for the prototype i'll probably keep it in raptor, and locally. Based on some work in Bug 1973522, and discussion with :acreskey
But this bug i'll make a point to emphasize it's just a prototype. One we've determined it has value i'll file another bug where we get it in CI and fully in production
| Assignee | ||
Updated•6 months ago
|
| Assignee | ||
Updated•6 months ago
|
Updated•6 months ago
|
| Assignee | ||
Updated•6 months ago
|
Updated•6 months ago
|
| Assignee | ||
Comment 2•6 months ago
|
||
(clarified name)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 3•6 months ago
|
||
we decided in a meeting to land a proxy mode version
here is an example Try run
| Assignee | ||
Comment 4•6 months ago
•
|
||
examining the results from those retriggers
Platform N Mean Stdev CV% Min Max
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
linux2404-64-shippable 22 81.99 1.065 1.30% 80.10 83.94
macosx1500-aarch64-shippable 18 169.63 2.631 1.55% 164.63 174.87
macosx1470-64-shippable 18 79.54 2.716 3.41% 74.69 84.31
windows11-64-24h2-shippable 17 59.34 9.936 16.74% 30.25 67.92
this is what i expected (minus linux). Windows is known to be super noisy at the moment, and we expected MacOS arm64 to be really good.
Surprised that linux is so stable given the recent bimodality!
we probably shouldn't run this on macOS 14.7 but nice to see it was stable too
| Assignee | ||
Comment 5•5 months ago
|
||
right now since windows shippable is having issues, i think i will consider running this on the hw-ref variant in parallel
additionally i've more or less decided to not run this on 14.7 macOS
WIP is almost ready. one thing is i rebased it on top of Bug 2014503
I'm going to tease bits of that out of it before putting this up for review
so for the time being we will run it on autoland without alerting (tier 3) on:
- windows 11
- Windows 11 (ref hardware)
- macOS 1500 (m4)
- Linux 24.04
| Assignee | ||
Comment 6•5 months ago
|
||
Updated•5 months ago
|
Updated•5 months ago
|
Updated•5 months ago
|
Updated•5 months ago
|
Updated•5 months ago
|
| Assignee | ||
Updated•5 months ago
|
Updated•5 months ago
|
Updated•5 months ago
|
Updated•5 months ago
|
Updated•5 months ago
|
Updated•4 months ago
|
Updated•4 months ago
|
Comment 8•4 months ago
|
||
| bugherder | ||
Comment 9•4 months ago
|
||
I've started looking at the Nav Bench in CI
Perf-compare against the same revision, i.e. A/A test
The reproducibility of results looks quite good; overall scores with quite a bit less than 1% difference between pushes (excluding the Windows 11 machines which are known to be a source of noise due to power supplies).
The individual subtests also show the same < 1% variance, with 10 iterations.
Comment 10•4 months ago
|
||
Comparing the same revision against itself, 10 iterations
| Assignee | ||
Updated•3 months ago
|
| Assignee | ||
Updated•3 months ago
|
Comment 11•3 months ago
•
|
||
Running a few more tests on the nav-bench to get a better understanding of noise and ability to detect regressions.
1.
A new A/A test, i.e. the same patch tested against itself to gauge variance.
PerfCompare
Overall delta < 1%
Benchmark score (higher is better), B:10 N:10. All deltas are Low confidence (within noise).
Platform Base New Change Confidence
------------------------------ ------- ------- ------- ----------
Linux (opt fission webrender) 98.37 98.58 +0.21% Low
macOS 14.70 95.21 95.74 +0.56% Low
macOS 15 190.83 191.25 +0.22% Low
Windows 11 ref 87.25 87.22 -0.03% Low
Windows 11 115.27 114.19 -0.93% Low
2.
Introducing a 1ms sleep just before network requests start the connect process, AsyncOpen
Regression picked up on all platforms but Linux (which curiously was not affected). (desktop)
nav-bench-overall — try push 6c98cca49c6c
Benchmark score (higher is better), B:10 N:10.
Platform Base New Change Verdict
------------------------------ ------- ------- -------- ----------
Linux (opt fission webrender) 98.37 97.77 -0.50% No change
macOS 14.70 95.21 84.95 -10.86% Regression
macOS 15 190.83 108.12 -43.24% Regression
Windows 11 ref 87.25 53.57 -38.83% Regression
Windows 11 115.27 59.91 -48.03%* Regression
3.
Introducing at 2ms sleep in AsyncOpen.
Regression picked up on all platforms (desktop).
Platform Base New Change Verdict
------------------------------ ------- ------- -------- ----------
Linux (opt fission webrender) 98.37 94.58 -3.85% Regression
macOS 14.70 95.21 71.19 -25.22% Regression
macOS 15 190.83 74.55 -60.93% Regression
Windows 11 ref 87.25 53.37 -38.83% Regression
Windows 11 115.27 60.12 -47.85% Regression
| Assignee | ||
Comment 12•3 months ago
|
||
thanks for sharing, i've linked this to the meta bug 2057233 where it might be more visible :D
Updated•2 months ago
|
Updated•2 months ago
|
Description
•