Closed Bug 20356 Opened 25 years ago Closed 25 years ago

JS thin locks fatter than fat locks?

Categories

(Core :: JavaScript Engine, defect, P3)

Product:
Core
Component:
JavaScript Engine
Type:
defect

Tracking

()

Status:
VERIFIED DUPLICATE of bug 20357

People

(Reporter: brendan, Assigned: rogerl)

References

(
URL
)

Details

More measurement needed, but so far we have evidence from waterson and shaver
that thin locks are no faster, and jband's tests showing that they're slower.
If they're not a win, we should simplify jslock.[ch] to be mostly-macro veneer
on top of NSPR locks and condvars.

/be
Assignee: clayton → rogerl
R, would you add this to the 1.5 pile?
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 25 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 20357 ***
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.