Closed
Bug 203922
Opened 22 years ago
Closed 22 years ago
userAgent strings in JS return Mozilla as Netscape 5.0
Categories
(Core :: DOM: Core & HTML, defect)
Tracking
()
People
(Reporter: billc, Unassigned)
Details
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030429 Mozilla Firebird/0.6
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030429 Mozilla Firebird/0.6
Javascript returns Mozilla as Netscape 5
<script>
alert(navigator.appName)
alert (navigator.appVersion)
</script>
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.Run script to display appName
2.
3.
Actual Results:
Displays Netscape 5.0
Expected Results:
Displayed Gecko 1.4 or Mozilla 1.4 or Firebird .6
Comment 1•22 years ago
|
||
-> JS Engine
Assignee: asa → rogerl
Component: Browser-General → JavaScript Engine
QA Contact: asa → pschwartau
Whiteboard: DUPEME
Comment 2•22 years ago
|
||
no, Netscape is correct
It would break many pages if we change that.
-> invalid (and you can dupe it to another invalid bug but the reporter can
search to find the discussions in this bugs)
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 22 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•22 years ago
|
||
But - Should the version number continue to be 5.0? Then there is no distinction
between versions.
How about "5.1.4a" ?
There are many new features in Moz, and espc. now with Firebird becoming Moz,
that there needs to be a distinction in web logs!
Comment 4•22 years ago
|
||
Reopening to re-resolve in the DOM Level 0 component;
this is simply not a JS Engine issue -
Status: RESOLVED → UNCONFIRMED
Resolution: INVALID → ---
Comment 5•22 years ago
|
||
Reassigning to DOM Level 0 -
Assignee: rogerl → dom_bugs
Component: JavaScript Engine → DOM Level 0
QA Contact: pschwartau → ashishbhatt
Summary: userAgent Strings in JS return Mozilla as Netscape 5.0 → userAgent strings in JS return Mozilla as Netscape 5.0
Comment 6•22 years ago
|
||
This is a duplicate of bug 61071,
"navigator.appName and navigator.appVersion"
Both issues are mentioned there, although the |appVersion| issue
doesn't seem to have been explained.
If anyone wants to discuss that particular issue further,
please reopen bug 61071.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 61071 ***
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 22 years ago → 22 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•