Open Bug 2045215 Opened 2 months ago Updated 10 days ago

[Perfherder][Comment_0] Alerts reassigned to a different summary are included in comment 0 when filing a new bug

Categories

(Tree Management :: Perfherder, defect, P2)

Tracking

(Not tracked)

ASSIGNED

People

(Reporter: afinder, Assigned: dmiculit)

References

Details

(Whiteboard: [fxp][operational][est-3d])

Attachments

(2 files)

Steps to reproduce:

  • use an alert summary that contains alerts reassigned to different alert summaries;
  • file a bug using the bug id of the culprit;

Expected results:

  • reassigned alerts should be excluded from comment 0, since they are associated with a different culprit and would confuse the author of the regressor bug;

Actual results:

  • reassigned alerts are included in comment 0;
Summary: [Perfherder][Comment_0] Reassigned alerts are included in comment 0 when filing a new bug → [Perfherder][Comment_0] Alerts reassigned to a different summary are included in comment 0 when filing a new bug

@afinder can you provide an example?

Severity: -- → S3
Flags: needinfo?(afinder)
Priority: -- → P2
Whiteboard: [fxp] → [fxp][operational][est-3d]

(In reply to Dave Hunt [:davehunt] [he/him] ⌚BST from comment #1)

@afinder can you provide an example?

An example for this would be bug 2053796, linked to alert summary 51287. Both of the styleeditor alerts in that summary are actually reassigned to a different summary, for a different bug ID, and should not show up in comment 0 for the mentioned bug. Attached also 2 screenshots for this bug, showing the alerts that should be omitted from comment 0.

Assignee: nobody → dmiculit
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Creator:
Created:
Updated:
Size: