Open Bug 205092 Opened 22 years ago Updated 2 years ago

Would like 'recall' feature to find and destroy mail that I sent. Pine can do it.

Categories

(MailNews Core :: Networking: SMTP, enhancement)

enhancement

Tracking

(Not tracked)

People

(Reporter: ion, Unassigned)

References

Details

User-Agent: Opera/7.10 (Windows NT 5.0; U) [en] Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4a) Gecko/20030401 When I send a message, I would like to be able to follow up with a note to its recipient's mail client that I would like the message deleted. There are all sorts of good reasons for this -- I'm logging the bug because I sent out a mail without a URL it needed. So, I sent it again with the URL, which is bound to confuse the people who received it. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Send mail 2. Realize error of ways 3. fret that the mail can not be recalled Actual Results: Sent near duplicate email Expected Results: allowed me to recall message
I think that for this to work both sides must be using Pine. Am I wrong? What happens if the recipient is using another mail client? does he get a second mail with an order to delete a previous mail?
I know that Microsoft Outlook can do it, but *only* in combination of Microsoft Exchange Server, becuase it's not a standard feature of SMTP, POP or IMAP. Are you using Exchange Server too ? I think this is a url that shows this behaviour : http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2001Apr/0176.html More info (userinterface of Outlook) at http://www.uwsp.edu/it/exchange/FAQs/faqrecallmessage.htm While this is all very interesting, it's a Exchange-only feature.
Ok, after reading http://www.uwsp.edu/it/exchange/FAQs/faqrecallmessage.htm, I think it's not completely true. It seems that recall-messages are recognized by the mailclient (Outlook, Pine). Sometimes this will result in both messages being automatically removed (the user never knows that there was a message that was recalled later). But sometimes, the user will see both messages, and when they open the recall-message they can get a notification that the other message is recalled, and sometimes they get asked if they want to recall that message. But I don't know what happens if you open the original message. Very confusing for the user. But it should be possible to implement the same behaviour (well, better ofcourse :-) in a non-Outlook mailclient, like Pine has done. An Exchange Server should not be really needed (although this is mentioned as a requirement on several webpages), the client can do it on its own (like Pine). But maybe can the Exchange Server do it on behalve of the user.
I think pine and MSOE do it the same way --- that is, that you can delete from either receiving mail client what you sent from the other mail client. I don't have the resources to test this just now. In pine you either get a prompt asking you if you will let the message be recalled, or a notice that it was recalled, depending on how you've configured it (this is the infinitely configurable pine we are speaking of.) In MSOE and Outlook, you get a dialog box asking you if you'll let the message be recalled.
This is a bit of a complicated feature that really lacks a standard, however, exchange is used pretty widely and people that use Outlook use this feature regularly and most of the time it really does work. The major flaw being that sometimes the exchange server sends a message back saying the email was successfully recalled, and sometimes it doesn't but the email still is successfully recalled. I'm not sure why. This is a worthwhile feature to implement in Mozilla - I consider this one of those major features that need to be implemented to target users that are currently using M$ products. I know many developers do not care about that particular audience, but I believe it is a large and important group of people that are not joining the Mozilla community and have legitimate reasons for not doing so. I know plenty of people that held out until a spell-checker was implemented (I am myself guilty of not installing this on employee systems because of this). I hope this bug does not take quite as long as that one did to reach fruition.
Product: MailNews → Core
Duplicate of/related to bug 234235?
Bug 234235 has a cooler number than this bug, but that's about reproducing MS Outlook's Recall Feature, while this is about recalling mail items ;) And furthermore, it was closed "won't fix", while I'm waiting for this feature to start proselytizing. You don't have to do anything Pine doesn't do! C'mon!
if you can attach a protocol log of what PINE does to issue a recall, we can look at it. Does it only work with MS Exchange servers?
No, pine works with regular old servers. It predates exchange! I haven't actually _used pine in years. But, I still pine for many of its features. Try these guys: http://www.washington.edu/pine/
there's no internet standards way of recalling mail that's already been sent. Does this only work if the recipient of the message is also Pine?
I don't know -- I'm really just an end user of mail applications. If you want to write a mozilla mail recall standard, maybe all of the other mail clients would pick it up. Then, I'd be a happy little mail recaller. You know the message ID and the recipients...
sorry for the spam. making bugzilla reflect reality as I'm not working on these bugs. filter on FOOBARCHEESE to remove these in bulk.
Assignee: sspitzer → nobody
QA Contact: nbaca → networking.smtp
OS: Windows 2000 → All
Hardware: PC → All
Product: Core → MailNews Core
Severity: normal → S3
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.