User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030516 Mozilla Firebird/0.6 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030516 Mozilla Firebird/0.6 When I open the page and start scrolling down with mouse wheel it freezes everytime at the following page, not others: http://www.helsinki.fi/ajankohtaista Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. open page http://www.helsinki.fi/ajankohtaista 2. use mousewheel to go down the page 3. freeze Actual Results: freeze Expected Results: not to freeze, to go down
Tapio, this WFM using Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030526 Mozilla Firebird/0.6 Problem might be caused by smooth scolling feature. Try disabling (if not already done) it by - entering about:config in location bar - hit <Enter> - select the first entry in the list and hit "g" or locate "general.smoothScroll" on your own - right click to bring up context menu and choose "Modify" - in the upcoming dialog change value to "false" => click [Ok] and try again.
No problems here with 20030526 build running under W2K. It works for me with either smoothscrolling disabled or enabled.
tried to switch off smoothscroll.. still freezes
Tapio, please download a current nightly build from http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firebird/nightly/latest-trunk and start Firebird with the -p option to create a new profile. Check back with us and tell us if it works now or if it still isn't working.
Ok, downloaded nightly build. Still does freeze...
Reporter: Can you reproduce the problem with Mozilla? http://texturizer.net/firebird/bugs.html
No, tried with mozilla 1.2.1 and didn't freeze. I downloaded the newest trunk of phoenix and still freezes. I use redhat 9 and i have installed all updates from redhat update service.
Tapio, please try to reproduce this with the latest mozilla builds. Mozilla 1.2.1 is quite old already.
Ok. Mozilla 1.4.1 freezes too at the same page.
What build of Mozilla are you using? Does about:buildconfig work? If so, can you paste the contents here?
I use Mozilla 1.4 RC1 about:buildconfig Build platform target i686-pc-linux-gnu Build tools Compiler Version Compiler flags gcc gcc version 2.95.3 20010315 (release) -Wall -W -Wno-unused -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -pedantic -Wno-long-long -g -pthread -pipe c++ gcc version 2.95.3 20010315 (release) -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions -Wall -Wconversion -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Woverloaded-virtual -Wsynth -Wno-ctor-dtor-privacy -pedantic -Wno-long-long -g -pthread -pipe -I/usr/X11R6/include Configure arguments --disable-tests --enable-extensions=default,irc --without-system-nspr --without-system-jpeg --without-system-zlib --without-system-png --without-system-mng --disable-debug --enable-optimize --disable-elf-dynstr-gc --enable-crypto
This is an automated message, with ID "auto-resolve01". This bug has had no comments for a long time. Statistically, we have found that bug reports that have not been confirmed by a second user after three months are highly unlikely to be the source of a fix to the code. While your input is very important to us, our resources are limited and so we are asking for your help in focussing our efforts. If you can still reproduce this problem in the latest version of the product (see below for how to obtain a copy) or, for feature requests, if it's not present in the latest version and you still believe we should implement it, please visit the URL of this bug (given at the top of this mail) and add a comment to that effect, giving more reproduction information if you have it. If it is not a problem any longer, you need take no action. If this bug is not changed in any way in the next two weeks, it will be automatically resolved. Thank you for your help in this matter. The latest beta releases can be obtained from: Firefox: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/firefox/ Thunderbird: http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/releases/1.5beta1.html Seamonkey: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/
This bug has been automatically resolved after a period of inactivity (see above comment). If anyone thinks this is incorrect, they should feel free to reopen it.