Closed
Bug 210202
Opened 23 years ago
Closed 22 years ago
Auto-installing into new folder breaks proxy autoconfig.
Categories
(SeaMonkey :: Installer, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 205514
People
(Reporter: ian.graham, Assigned: ssu0262)
Details
(Keywords: verifyme)
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows 98; H010818; YComp 5.0.2.4)
Build Identifier: http://mozilla.org/releases/index.html#1.4rc2 (Talkback enabled Full Installer )
Initial conditions: I had local installed versions of Mozilla 1.3 and Mozilla
1.4b, installed into the folders:
...\mozilla.org\mozilla
...\mozilla.org\mozilla1.4b
I then downloaded 1.4RC2 (Talkback enabled full installer) and ran the
installer -- choosing to install the application into a new folder:
...\mozilla.org\mozilla1.4rc2
Installation went fine -- but upon startup, the browser couldn't find the proxy
autoconfiguration details, and I couldn't connect through my firewall.
I next used Windows 'uninstall' to remove the 1.3 and 1.4b versions (both had
been 'full installer' versions), but this did not resolve the problem.
The problem was fixed by physically removing the
...\mozilla.org\mozilla1.4b
folder. When I did that, the RC2 version was able to locate and load the proxy
config data.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. see above..
2.
3.
Comment 1•23 years ago
|
||
It's known that 1.4b breaks PAC but how could it break a Mozilla installed in a
different folder ?
| Reporter | ||
Comment 2•23 years ago
|
||
I was suprised myself ... I previously encountered the PAC problem with the
1.4b install (which I had installed on top of 1.3), and consequently had to re-
install 1.4b in a new folder. I thought I'd avoid that problem this time, by
also installing 1.4RC2 in a new folder.
So, the problem reported here may have been a side-effect of a rather long
sequence of installs:
1) Install 1.3
2) Install 1.4b on top of 1.3 (same folder)
3) Re-install 1.4b in a new folder
4) Install 1.4RC2 in a new folder
And I'm sure there's a 'Install 1.2' back in the sequence somewhere.....
Needless to say, it's a bit hard to reproduce .... :-(
More likely this...
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 205514 ***
Updated•21 years ago
|
Product: Browser → Seamonkey
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•