Closed Bug 210292 Opened 21 years ago Closed 21 years ago

Tone of toolbar tooltip text inconsistent

Categories

(Firefox :: Toolbars and Customization, defect)

defect
Not set
trivial

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
Firefox1.0

People

(Reporter: keith, Assigned: sipaq)

References

Details

Attachments

(1 file, 1 obsolete file)

User-Agent:       Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5a) Gecko/20030621 Mozilla Firebird/0.6
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5a) Gecko/20030621 Mozilla Firebird/0.6

Some toolbar icons describe what the user will do when the button is clicked;
others describe what the button does when clicked.

What the user will do:
Back: "Go back one page"
Forward: "Go forward one page"
Reload: "Reload current page"
Stop: "Stop loading this page"
Print: "Print this page"

What the button does:
Downloads: "Displays the progress of ongoing downloads"
History: "Displays pages you've viewed recently"
Bookmarks: "Displays your bookmarks"
New Tab: "Opens a new tab"
New Window: "Opens a new window"

My personal suggestion is to use the tone of the first set (back, forward,
etc.), but consistency is all I ask for.

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
See also discussion starting at bug 79240 comment 5.  Alex Bishop and I prefer
the first group; mpt prefers the second group.
Attached patch Simple patch (obsolete) — Splinter Review
Here's a simple patch, which changes the descriptive wording of some tooltips
to a more action-oriented wording.
Confirming bug.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
OS: Windows XP → All
Hardware: PC → All
Attachment #126350 - Flags: review?(hyatt)
Comment on attachment 126350 [details] [diff] [review]
Simple patch

Noririty, thia is a very simple patch, which only changes the icon tooltip
wording in avery slight manner to make it more consistent. Can you review and
apply the patch?
Attachment #126350 - Flags: review?(hyatt) → review?(noririty)
Target Milestone: --- → Firebird1.0
Taking QA Contact
QA Contact: asa → bugzilla
I happen to disagree with this patch, the second group is IMO better from a UI
perspective.  I suggest we leave wording issues for the formal UI review laid
out in the roadmap.
Word for Windows, Internet Explorer, Netscape 4, and Opera 7 all use tooltips
similar to the first group.  I wasn't able to find any programs that use the
second group.  We shouldn't need formal UI review to make our newest tooltips
consistent with the rest of the world and with the rest of our tooltips, even if
two people (you and mpt) prefer a different wording.
Blocks: 214267
Taking.
Assignee: hyatt → bugzilla
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Comment on attachment 126350 [details] [diff] [review]
Simple patch

Noririty's review is no longer sufficient.
Attachment #126350 - Flags: review?(noririty) → review?(bugs)
Attachment #126350 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #126350 - Flags: review?(bugs)
Comment on attachment 141052 [details] [diff] [review]
updated and de-bitrotted patch

Blake, could you please review this 5-liner patch, which improves our toolbar
toltip text a little bit.
Attachment #141052 - Flags: review?(firefox)
Attachment #141052 - Flags: review?(firefox) → review+
Fixed.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 21 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
No longer blocks: 214267
Blocks: 214267
QA Contact: bugzilla → toolbars
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: