211941 - Dual monitor: CSS Hover Inconsistent

Status: VERIFIED DUPLICATE of bug 159277

(SeaMonkey :: General, defect)

Description

[C.L. Wilson]

User-Agent:       Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624

Example Location: http://www.iomega.com/global/index.jsp

Summary: This problem occurs when on a secondary monitor to the left of the 0,0
axis (negative coorinates).

Example Description: When hovering your mouse over the regions listed in the
left navigation or over the map areas in the main body of the page, the hover
event fires and then terminates prematurely.  This can make certian types of
DHTML menus very difficult to use.

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Place browser on secondary monitor to the left of the 0,0 axis
2. Load page: http://www.iomega.com/global/index.jsp
3. Place mouse over North America region of the map or the text in left navigation
4. Notice the early termination of the hover event

Actual Results:  
The hover event fires and ends prematurely.

Expected Results:  
While the mouse is still over the object with the hover attribute, the hover
event should continue and not end prematurely.

 - Mozilla Default theme

Monitor: Dell P1110
Video Card: nVidia Quadro4 700 XGL w/ Dualview enabled
Processor: Intel XEON 1.8 GHz
Memory: 1GB
OS: Windows 2000 SP3

Comment 1

[Eric Carlson]

I notice the same problem. Also, hovering over items on the personal toolbar, or
child items in any of the application menus (File, Edit, View, etc.) had the
same problem on the secondary monitor.

Same problem on two systems, both running Mozilla 1.4-final on Windows 2000/SP4.
One has a pair of NVidia Riva TNT2 Model 64 (32.Meg) based video cards, and the
other has a dual-output NVidia Ti4200 (64.Meg) based card. I've used various
versions of recent NVidia drivers.

This problem has been around for a long time.

Comment 2

[Vedran Miletic]

Either a duplicate of 159277 or 98830, it seems more like 159277.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 159277 ***

Comment 3

[Henrik Skupin [:whimboo][⌚️UTC+1]]

verified.