Closed Bug 212281 Opened 18 years ago Closed 16 years ago
mail does not open a thread with unread messages when moving to next unread (only with IMAP)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5a) Gecko/20030707 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5a) Gecko/20030707 when a thread of message with unread message in it is collapsed and "spacebar" is pressed in order to move to the next message the thread is not expanded and the messages therein are ignored. This happens only with IMAP accounts Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual Results: thread is not expanded Expected Results: thread should be expanded (like it does in POP accounts) and the next unread message within the thread should be displayed
This is an automated message, with ID "auto-resolve01". This bug has had no comments for a long time. Statistically, we have found that bug reports that have not been confirmed by a second user after three months are highly unlikely to be the source of a fix to the code. While your input is very important to us, our resources are limited and so we are asking for your help in focussing our efforts. If you can still reproduce this problem in the latest version of the product (see below for how to obtain a copy) or, for feature requests, if it's not present in the latest version and you still believe we should implement it, please visit the URL of this bug (given at the top of this mail) and add a comment to that effect, giving more reproduction information if you have it. If it is not a problem any longer, you need take no action. If this bug is not changed in any way in the next two weeks, it will be automatically resolved. Thank you for your help in this matter. The latest beta releases can be obtained from: Firefox: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/firefox/ Thunderbird: http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/releases/1.5beta1.html Seamonkey: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/
This bug has been automatically resolved after a period of inactivity (see above comment). If anyone thinks this is incorrect, they should feel free to reopen it.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 16 years ago
Resolution: --- → EXPIRED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.