User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5a) Gecko/20030718 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5a) Gecko/20030718 Under Mozilla 1.5a and 1.4 (WinXP Home Edition) a few of the GIFs in the page http://www2.slac.stanford.edu/vvc/theory/halflife.html do not display correctly. They do display fully under IE 6.0. The problem GIFs are image002, image004, and image006 in the last two paragraphs on the page. All the other GIFs display correctly. Viewing with normal size (16 pixels) for proportional text under Mozilla, the top half of the GIFs is clipped. I have to use "Ctrl +" three times to make the surrounding text large enough so the GIFs aren't clipped. In contrast, under IE the GIFs aren't truncated no matter how small I set the displayed text size. I assume why the GIFs display fully under IE, but not under Mozilla, is because of some of the surrounding code produced by FrontPage: v:shapes, v:formulas, OLEObject, etc. (non-standard stuff?) Maybe that code is ignored by Mozilla, but not by IE. There are two other peculiarities in this area. First, if you right-click over the links to these particular GIFs in IE and select Properties, the properties popup does not indicate a GIF. For all the other GIFs on the page, the IE popup does indicate a GIF. Under Mozilla, all the GIFs, even the problem GIFs, are indicated as GIFs in the right-click Properties popup. Second, if you look at the raw GIFs, e.g., right-click one of the links and select View Image, the lines in the GIF are weighted like bold characters. That is what Mozilla displays (or tries to). In contrast, IE somehow translates the bold line GIF back to normal weight, again indicating it isn't just simply displaying a GIF. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Observe the GIFs in the last two paragraphs of http://www2.slac.stanford.edu/vvc/theory/halflife.html. 2. 3. Actual Results: The upper portions of the GIFs are not displayed. Expected Results: Display the full GIFs.
Just fixed a few days back. ;) *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 79315 ***
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 16 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.