Closed
Bug 217002
Opened 21 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
relatively-positioned table row should be containing block for abs pos elts
Categories
(Core :: Layout: Positioned, defect)
Tracking
()
People
(Reporter: eyalroz1, Unassigned)
References
Details
Attachments
(2 files)
MSIE 6 rendering of the testcase
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030815
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030815
According to my understanding of the CSS 2 spec section regarding containing
positioning and containing blocks (
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/visuren.html#choose-position
) a table row with "position: relative" should be a containing block for its
descendent elements. This claim holds, for example, in MSIE 6, but not in
Mozilla. Why?
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
|
Reporter | |
Comment 1•21 years ago
|
||
When renderng this file, one would expect the browser to position the text-link
td's within their respective tr's. Mozilla doesn't.
|
|
Reporter | |
Comment 2•21 years ago
|
||
MSIE 6 behaves as (I believe is) expected.
|
|
Reporter | |
Comment 3•21 years ago
|
||
Sorry. I am stupid.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 5016 ***
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 21 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
I'd rather leave this as a separate bug.
Status: RESOLVED → UNCONFIRMED
Resolution: DUPLICATE → ---
Summary: relatively-positioned table row does not generate a container block → relatively-positioned table row should be containing block for abs pos elts
->style system (for frame construction)
Assignee: table → dbaron
Component: Layout: Tables → Style System
QA Contact: madhur → ian
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Assignee: dbaron → nobody
QA Contact: ian → style-system
|
||
Updated•13 years ago
|
Component: Style System (CSS) → Layout: R & A Pos
QA Contact: style-system → layout.r-and-a-pos
|
|
Reporter | |
Comment 8•12 years ago
|
||
I don't mind this being marked as a dupe, but then, it wasn't marked as a dupe of 63895 for 10 years, so maybe there's a difference I'm missing.
|
||
Comment 9•12 years ago
|
||
Bug 63895 comment 101 etc., which were posted after this bug's comment 6, seem to clarify that that bug deals with rows, cells, etc. in addition to whole tables.
|
|
||
Comment 10•12 years ago
|
||
Pretty confident there's nothing in this bug that isn't in bug 63895.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 21 years ago → 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•