Closed
Bug 219225
Opened 21 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
underline position is too low for non-CJK langgroups
Categories
(Core Graveyard :: GFX: Win32, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
People
(Reporter: jshin1987, Assigned: jshin1987, NeedInfo)
References
Details
(Keywords: intl)
Attachments
(1 file)
2.40 KB,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
In bug 156943 and bug 76097, the underline position was lowered toward the
descent because for CJK, the underline crossing the lower part of a glyph hurts
the readabilty rather severely. However, in Western typography (for this bug,
let's forget about Indic cases where the baseline is around a third from the top
of bbox [1]), the underline usually crosses the lower stem of 'p' and 'g'
instead of brely touching the bottommost part. Therefore, I'm proposing that we
get back to what we used to have for *non-CJK* lang groups. And, I'll do the
same in bug 218032.
[1] That's, I read, why 'pan-unicode' fonts need to have multiple
script-specific baselines, but I have little idea how they can actually be used
in rendering/layout.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•21 years ago
|
||
Even with this patch, something is not quite right. Still MS IE's rendering of
underlined text(European text) looks better than that of Mozilla.
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•21 years ago
|
||
it might be a 1-off(or even 0.5-off) difference.
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Summary: underline position is too lower for non-CJK langgroups → underline position is too low for non-CJK langgroups
Comment 3•21 years ago
|
||
win98 2004022608
at this page underline is so low it falls on the next line
http://www.italieni.it/
Comment 4•20 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 226590 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Updated•16 years ago
|
Product: Core → Core Graveyard
Comment 5•10 years ago
|
||
This bug has been buried in the graveyard and has not been updated in over 5 years. It is probably safe to assume that it will never be fixed, so resolving as WONTFIX.
[Mass-change filter: graveyard-wontfix-2014-09-24]
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
![]() |
||
Comment 6•10 years ago
|
||
Assuming this bug is still present, it should be moved to Core:Text. But is it still present?
Flags: needinfo?(gphemsley)
Updated•10 years ago
|
Flags: needinfo?(gphemsley) → needinfo?(jshin1987)
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•