Closed
Bug 219659
Opened 21 years ago
Closed 21 years ago
Misleading wording describing severity "blocker" on Bugzilla Helper form
Categories
(Bugzilla :: Creating/Changing Bugs, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
Bugzilla 2.18
People
(Reporter: bugzilla, Assigned: gerv)
References
()
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
954 bytes,
patch
|
justdave
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030913 Firebird/0.6.1+
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030913 Firebird/0.6.1+
The Severity Option when filling out the Bugzilla Helper form describing a
"blocker" severity bug as one that "prevents you from testing or developing
Mozilla".
I don't know whether that an accurate description or not, but everywhere in
triaging and QAing bugs, "blocker" is treated as meaning 'prevents *mozilla.org
developers* from testing or developing Mozilla'.
Rewording the description on the helper form would stop people from labeling
bugs as blocker because it blocks their personal work, and then wondering why
the severity of their bug gets downgraded when they did what the form said.
(Example: http://mecha.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219642)
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•21 years ago
|
||
The man has a fair point. This changes the wording to "This bug prevents
Mozilla developers from testing or developing the software."
Gerv
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•21 years ago
|
||
Moving to Bugzilla product.
Gerv
Severity: enhancement → minor
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Component: Bugzilla: Other moz.org Issues → Creating/Changing Bugs
Product: mozilla.org → Bugzilla
Target Milestone: --- → Bugzilla 2.18
Version: other → 2.17.4
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•21 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 131803 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch v.1
Dave: could you rubber-stamp and then approve this wording change?
Gerv
Attachment #131803 -
Flags: review?(justdave)
Comment 5•21 years ago
|
||
I don't know if it's suitable to include "Mozilla developers" in the
/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/template/en/default directory. It contains the
default template, that will be the out-of-the-box thing for all new Bugzilla
installations.
Comment 6•21 years ago
|
||
Brainstorming idea to consider: how about leaving "developers", without Mozilla
in front?
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•21 years ago
|
||
That template is intentionally Moz-specific in lots of places, and is marked as
such. It's officially in the tree as an "example" :-)
Gerv
Comment 8•21 years ago
|
||
>> That template is intentionally Moz-specific in lots of places
I did
grep -R "Mozilla" * | grep -v "Public"
in the "bugzilla" directory in order to find references to Mozilla (excluding
"Mozilla Public License").
I found around 87 matches. The only template that I could find that is
specifically made for bugzilla.mozilla.org is create-guided.html.tmpl.
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•21 years ago
|
||
> The only template that I could find that is
> specifically made for bugzilla.mozilla.org is create-guided.html.tmpl.
Yep, that's right - it's currently the only template which is in the tree under
the "example" idea we thought up :-)
Gerv
Comment 10•21 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 131803 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch v.1
works for me.
Attachment #131803 -
Flags: review?(justdave) → review+
Updated•21 years ago
|
Flags: approval+
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•21 years ago
|
||
Fixed.
Checking in template/en/default/bug/create/create-guided.html.tmpl;
/cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/template/en/default/bug/create/create-guided.html.tmpl,v
<-- create-guided.html.tmpl
new revision: 1.13; previous revision: 1.12
done
Gerv
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 21 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•12 years ago
|
QA Contact: myk → default-qa
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•