Closed Bug 222340 Opened 22 years ago Closed 22 years ago

very slow rendering of a page with many png images with alpha channels

Categories

(Core :: Layout, defect)

x86
Windows XP
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED WORKSFORME

People

(Reporter: patrick, Unassigned)

References

()

Details

User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 Firebird/0.7 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 Firebird/0.7 The page renders extremely slow (eg. if minimze firebird and then maximize it again or if a change to another tab and back). The effect is a lot bigger if I have more png images on the page. In the old firebird 6.1. The page gets displayed instantaneously. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Browse to the page 2. Change to another task/tab 3. Change back to firebird/the tab displaying the page Actual Results: Takes some time to show the page Expected Results: show it instantaneously like in the old firebird 6.1 The example.html page was changed, in order to comply to the w3c standarts. There is also another example with much more graphics. This page doesn't totally strictly follow the w3c guidelines, but worked perfectly in firebird 6.1. It may help show the extrem difference in the rendering speed.
sorry, forgot to add the link to the second example: http://www.wogen-des-schicksals.de/home/butcher/example-big.html
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031216 Firebird/0.7+ The page does load extremely slowly, but does anyone else have a 0.6.1 build to test to confirm that it renders the page much faster?
Some collegues of mine tried it also with the same results.
Tested this bug with: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031208 and Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031216 Firebird/0.7+ I don't notice any difference in speed between the two. I expected it to be "slower" than normal, but that can be expected with 114 images, total 448kb, with alpha. (example-big.html). If this *is* a bug, then I don't think it's limited to FireBird. Set to Browser / ImageLib?
WFM on WinXP trunk 2003120608. Reporter: please try this again using a recent nightly build from <http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/mozilla/nightly/latest/>. If it works, please resolve this bug as WFM. Thanks!
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031217 Firebird/0.7+ The rendering under Linux is not *very* fast, but it is not very slow either. Using the same build of Firebird, loading under Linux on a Celeron-533 is *much* faster than under WinXP on a P4-2.4 ! Confirming under WindowsXP. Linux seems not to be affected by this bug.
The page is rendered very slowly.. This needs to be moved to Browser and not firebird... and to the correct component.. either layout or imagelib Confirming for Windows XP on Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031217 and Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031216 Firebird/0.7+ I'm not sure this qualifies as a bug, and isn't just a fact of such a complex page. but I feel that the issue needs to be investigated further.. and not just written off as that's the way it's supposed to be.
i tried 0.6.1 and it is still 'slow'. So it has nothing to do with the version of FB used.
Moving to Browser -> Layout, probably it could go better to imagelib due to the alpha channel thing in the summary, but it needs further investigation.
Component: General → Layout
Product: Firebird → Browser
Version: unspecified → Trunk
Assignee: blake → other
QA Contact: ian
>WFM on WinXP trunk 2003120608. >Reporter: please try this again using a recent nightly build from ><http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/mozilla/nightly/latest/>. If it works, >please resolve this bug as WFM. Thanks! jep, that was it with that version it works very fast again.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 22 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.