Closed Bug 222876 Opened 21 years ago Closed 15 years ago

help content ignores specified font

Categories

(SeaMonkey :: Help Documentation, defect)

x86
Windows 2000
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED WONTFIX

People

(Reporter: Biesinger, Unassigned)

Details

Attachments

(1 file)

In preferences/appearance/fonts, I specified "Serif" as my default proportional font. help is ignoring that and displays a sans-serif font. it should respect the pref. tested in 2003101004
I don't think font pref applies to chrome:// files
It should.
Attached patch PatchSplinter Review
Attachment #133642 - Flags: review?(neil.parkwaycc.co.uk)
Comment on attachment 133642 [details] [diff] [review] Patch I'm still seeing font-family in the patched file, that looks wrong. Also, should we be specifying pixel sizes or relative sizes?
Attachment #133642 - Flags: review?(neil.parkwaycc.co.uk) → review-
I kept using font-family for h1, h2, and h3 tags because those should be sans-serif. I don't want to stip the style that much ;). Can you note any specific lines you have problems with?
Comment on attachment 133642 [details] [diff] [review] Patch OK, so how about leaving the font-size on all the elements too?
Er... why are we setting pixel font-sizes, exactly?
yeah, we really should do em's.
Or even large/x-large/whatever....
I'm beginning to disagree with this bug. Help on Windows looks awful with the serif font by default. Should the Help docs really looks like a normal HTML document to the user?
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
The help documents should be in whatever font the user finds most readable. That's all. If our default font is not easily readable, we should perhaps change it. In the default prefs.
I can understand font size (which can be changed with Ctrl+), but I find that the help documents are much harder to read and skim through with the Win32's serif fonts.
Then we shouldn't have those fonts as our default fonts.
well, true, but many websites rely on them. Not many sites are viewed perfectly in sans-serif font. Most of the time it causes font sizes much larger than that which was intended for.
Hm? At the same font size? Or are you talking about perceived font sizes?
I'm meaning that 12pt sans-serif is larger than 12pt serif. On Linux, sans-serif is the default on my system and I notice that website font sizes are so large that they cause the layout to get messed up. On windows, serif fonts are used, which are smaller, which prevents the layout from moving inappropriately. If I were to use Times New roman on Linux, I don't see this problem.
By "larger" I assume you mean "wider"? Because it should be the same height...
yes, but back to the point: I find the help documentation more appropriate to have a sans-serif font than a serif font. It seems easier to skim and remember. I don't agree, however, to having a set font size, but that is already fixed (through text zoom).
Well, I have to say that I find serif font with maybe sans-serif (or somehow else clearly marked) headings much easier to skim.... (since the headings then jump out at me).
sure, I'm cool with having the headings sans-serif. I'd also like the Section TOCs sans-serif as well. Think this will help with readability, bz?
It may, sure. No problems here with styling headings in a "not-normal" font, since that's the whole point. ;)
Moving to new Help component owner.
Assignee: rlk → neil.parkwaycc.co.uk
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
This bug should be WONTFIX to me. If we respected every pref a user set for font, the help documentation would be nothing more than HTML with no styles, which looks really bad. We need to keep a professional look in the Help documentation.
Product: Browser → Seamonkey
MASS-CHANGE: This bug report is registered in the SeaMonkey product, but has been without a comment since the inception of the SeaMonkey project. This means that it was logged against the old Mozilla suite and we cannot determine that it's still valid for the current SeaMonkey suite. Because of this, we are setting it to an UNCONFIRMED state. If you can confirm that this report still applies to current SeaMonkey 2.x nightly builds, please set it back to the NEW state along with a comment on how you reproduced it on what Build ID, or if it's an enhancement request, why it's still worth implementing and in what way. If you can confirm that the report doesn't apply to current SeaMonkey 2.x nightly builds, please set it to the appropriate RESOLVED state (WORKSFORME, INVALID, WONTFIX, or similar). If no action happens within the next few months, we move this bug report to an EXPIRED state. Query tag for this change: mass-UNCONFIRM-20090614
Status: NEW → UNCONFIRMED
Assignee: neil → nobody
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
QA Contact: danielwang → help
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Creator:
Created:
Updated:
Size: