Closed
Bug 226229
Opened 21 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
Query.cgi HTML Transitional 4.01 validation fails for query.cgi
Categories
(Bugzilla :: Query/Bug List, defect)
Bugzilla
Query/Bug List
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
Bugzilla 2.18
People
(Reporter: goobix, Assigned: anthony)
References
()
Details
(Keywords: regression)
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
2.74 KB,
patch
|
kiko
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
It appears some <br> tags added in the wrong place make query.cgi HTML
validation fail.
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•21 years ago
|
||
<justdave> cvsblame says that was introduced by the patch on bug 37749
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•21 years ago
|
||
I must have entered these <br>s to make it prettier. This patch uses
style-sheets instead.
After I corrected the <br>s, the WDG HTML validator said OK, but
http://validator.w3.org/ complained about a couple of other things, which I
checked with the standard. First, the <script> tag needs to be
<script type="text/javascript">
(http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-html401-19991224/interact/scripts.html#h-18.2.1).
Second, <p>
(http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-html401-19991224/struct/text.html#h-9.3.1)
cannot contain block elements, and <noscript>
(http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-html401-19991224/interact/scripts.html#h-18.3.1)is
a block element. This patch also corrects both these errors.
Reporter | ||
Updated•21 years ago
|
Attachment #136189 -
Flags: review?(kiko)
Comment 3•21 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 136189 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch - take one
Thanks for the patch.
I'm not sure I like the bug_changes class applied to those two specific dts.
Perhaps it would be better to have something like
<dl class="bug_changes">
<dt> ...
and then use
dl.bug_changes dt {
...
}
as the selector. The rest looks fine.
Attachment #136189 -
Flags: review?(kiko) → review-
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•21 years ago
|
||
Very interesting, I didn't really know. It's much better this way.
Attachment #136189 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 5•21 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 136372 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch - take two
Thanks for the patch!
Attachment #136372 -
Flags: review+
Updated•21 years ago
|
Assignee: justdave → anthony
Flags: approval?
Updated•21 years ago
|
Flags: approval? → approval+
Comment 6•21 years ago
|
||
Checked in for Anthony.
/cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/template/en/default/search/form.html.tmpl,v
<-- form.html.tmpl
new revision: 1.20; previous revision: 1.19
/cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/template/en/default/search/search.html.tmpl,v
<-- search.html.tmpl
new revision: 1.17; previous revision: 1.16
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 21 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•21 years ago
|
Target Milestone: --- → Bugzilla 2.18
Comment 7•20 years ago
|
||
It isn't valid at this time.
The version on b.m.o is only tentatively valid (missing encoding):
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/query.cgi
The one on landfill is invalid (misplaced INPUT and LABEL, unopened TR):
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://landfill.bugzilla.org/bugzilla-tip/query.cgi%3Fformat%3Dadvanced
Reopening.
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Target Milestone: Bugzilla 2.18 → ---
Comment 8•20 years ago
|
||
Encoding is another issue -- bug 126266 to be precise. It might have been nicer
to open a new bug for the new search breakage, but okay.
Assignee: anthony → nobody
Status: REOPENED → NEW
Updated•20 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → anthony
Target Milestone: --- → Bugzilla 2.18
Comment 9•20 years ago
|
||
This has a checked in patch. Please file a new bug.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 21 years ago → 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 10•20 years ago
|
||
In fact, this bug covers both 2.18 and tip, and the problem reported in comment
7 only exists on the tip. I filed bug 265011 to cover that.
Updated•12 years ago
|
QA Contact: matty_is_a_geek → default-qa
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•