Closed
Bug 227308
Opened 21 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
RFE: Junk filter doesn't expunge messages from IMAP Inbox
Categories
(MailNews Core :: Filters, enhancement)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
WORKSFORME
People
(Reporter: hacksoncode, Unassigned)
Details
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6a) Gecko/20031002 Firebird/0.7+
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6a) Gecko/20031002 Firebird/0.7+
There are other bugs that talk about problems with filters moving messages
leaving deleted messages behind, but I'm not really seeing that (and even if I
were, it's especially egregious WRT spam). I'm seeing the messages being left on
the IMAP server intact, and just removed from the local Inbox index (it seems).
I read my work mail from home using a webmail interface. I would have thought
that Mozilla/Thunderbird (which I leave running on my machine at work) would
have moved the messages out of my Inbox, leaving it uncluttered. But it doesn't
seem to work that way. That makes it almost impossible to use my webmail
interface because of the giant piles of spam in my Inbox.
The messages don't go away until I empty my trash.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Bring up both Outlook and Thunderbird/Mozilla.
2. Allow spam to arrive and be moved to the junk folder by Mozilla.
Actual Results:
Messages still appear in Outlook, or in a webmail interface (even after
refreshing). They don't look marked deleted in Outlook/webmail... they just look
normal.
Expected Results:
Messages should have been moved immediately from the server.
I'm using "move to trash" as my delete method (as opposed to "mark as deleted").
Also, it doesn't seem to matter whether the destination spam folder is local or
on the IMAP server.
Updated•20 years ago
|
Product: MailNews → Core
Comment 1•20 years ago
|
||
This is an automated message, with ID "auto-resolve01".
This bug has had no comments for a long time. Statistically, we have found that
bug reports that have not been confirmed by a second user after three months are
highly unlikely to be the source of a fix to the code.
While your input is very important to us, our resources are limited and so we
are asking for your help in focussing our efforts. If you can still reproduce
this problem in the latest version of the product (see below for how to obtain a
copy) or, for feature requests, if it's not present in the latest version and
you still believe we should implement it, please visit the URL of this bug
(given at the top of this mail) and add a comment to that effect, giving more
reproduction information if you have it.
If it is not a problem any longer, you need take no action. If this bug is not
changed in any way in the next two weeks, it will be automatically resolved.
Thank you for your help in this matter.
The latest beta releases can be obtained from:
Firefox: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/firefox/
Thunderbird: http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/releases/1.5beta1.html
Seamonkey: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/
Well, I'm changing this from a bug report to an RFE. I still think it's a very
important feature to have for people that read mail primarily using Thunderbird
but secondarily other interfaces such as web-based mail, because it severely
limits the usefulness of Thunderbird's filtering system.
Without this, I'm seriously considering turning off my Thunderbird filtering and
switching over to having Outlook do my filtering, because it will properly
expunge my inbox. That would be sad.
Severity: normal → enhancement
Summary: Junk filter doesn't expunge messages from IMAP Inbox → RFE: Junk filter doesn't expunge messages from IMAP Inbox
Comment 3•18 years ago
|
||
sorry for the spam. making bugzilla reflect reality as I'm not working on these bugs. filter on FOOBARCHEESE to remove these in bulk.
Assignee: sspitzer → nobody
Updated•17 years ago
|
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Assignee | ||
Updated•17 years ago
|
Product: Core → MailNews Core
Haven't seen this on recent builds.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•