Closed
Bug 234129
Opened 21 years ago
Closed 18 years ago
OCSP Algorithm ID comparison reportedly faulty
Categories
(NSS :: Libraries, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 357197
People
(Reporter: nelson, Unassigned)
References
Details
Alex Deacon of Verisign.com wrote:
> [...] while doing some interop testing with the latest Mozilla OCSP
> release against our new OCSP responder, we noticed an issue in the way you
> compare CertID's in the request and responses. In particular it looks like
> you are doing a binary comparison of the whole CertID structure in the
> response. The problem is that your client includes the OPTIONAL parameters
> field in the AlgorithmIdentifier structure in the request, but our
> pre-produced responses do not (did not) include the parameters field. Thus
> when your client gets the response you rejet it as it doesn't match the
> request. To fix this, we have modified our responder to include the
> optional parameters field as it doesn't seem to break the other OCSP client
> implementations we are testing. However, I would suggest however that you
> may want to modify the way you compare CertID's to not take the algorithm
> identifier into account...or perhaps at a minimum not take the parameters
> field into account. This would involve parsing out the CertID structure,
> but I don't think this would add much overhead.
Thanks for this report, Alex.
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•21 years ago
|
||
Although this but is not yet confirmed, if true, we need to fix it before
enabling OCSP by default
Blocks: ocspdefault
Reporter | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
QA Contact: bishakhabanerjee → jason.m.reid
Reporter | ||
Updated•19 years ago
|
Assignee: wtchang → nobody
QA Contact: jason.m.reid → libraries
Comment 2•18 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 357197 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Updated•18 years ago
|
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Comment 3•18 years ago
|
||
357197 has a patch for this issue. Closing this bug as a dup (even though it was first).
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 357197 ***
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 18 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•