Closed
Bug 235681
Opened 21 years ago
Closed 16 years ago
Add SCTP support
Categories
(Core :: Networking, enhancement)
Core
Networking
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 486199
People
(Reporter: wolruf, Unassigned)
References
(Depends on 1 open bug, )
Details
SCTP support seems to be working already as the following Web site has a Mozilla
tarball with SCTP support: http://www.sctp.org/
Not widely used, but interesting to have on a compile basis, it has RFCs
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2960.txt and Linux/BSD* kernel implementations being
worked on.
I came across this looking at latest 2.4 Linux kernel changes:
http://lwn.net/Articles/72924/
Comment 1•21 years ago
|
||
My company is using SCTP, but in Telecom related projects (Diameter, SIP,
SoftSwitches, etc ...). I like SCTP a lot (and I work with it), but I don't
think it's ready for general purpose use. The problem is support in various
OS'es and embedded devices (routers, firewalls, proxies, ...).
Note that <http://www.sctp.org/> is probably the only website in the world that
uses SCTP. It's probably unreachable for most people anyway, since SCTP might be
blocked by routers, firewalls or proxies ; just like the difficulties that you
can have while trying to set up an RTP-stream.
My recommendation is FUTURE. One day, when SCTP support can be found
semi-standard on very OS (I know, Linux is going that way), then we can think
about it ... But if sctp.org has implemented it already, then we might consider
to bring the changes into CVS, as a compile option.
Comment 2•21 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #1)
> Note that <http://www.sctp.org/> is probably the only website in the world that
> uses SCTP. It's probably unreachable for most people anyway, since SCTP might be
> blocked by routers, firewalls or proxies
Heh. explains why I can't get to that website :)
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•21 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > Note that <http://www.sctp.org/> is probably the only website in the world that
> > uses SCTP. It's probably unreachable for most people anyway, since SCTP might be
> > blocked by routers, firewalls or proxies
>
> Heh. explains why I can't get to that website :)
Didn't know that, I can reach this site, maybe I can upload the modified mozilla
tarball they're hosting on some other TCP-reachable site ?
Comment 4•21 years ago
|
||
hm, actually, it now works for me.. don't know why it didn't before
Comment 5•19 years ago
|
||
A good introduction to SCTP can be found at <http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-sctp/?ca=dgr-lnxw01SCTP>. finally, SCTP is becoming mainstream (which makes my daytime-job a lot easier).
Useful links :
- comparison between TCP and SCTP for HTTP : <http://www.it.kth.se/courses/2G1305/Sample-papers/Henrik_Oesterdahl-sctp-20050525.pdf>
- a patch for Apache to use SCTP : <http://www.cis.udel.edu/~nataraja/research/apache/README>
- a modified version of mozilla (from 2002 !), which runs on *BSD with SCTP-support :
<http://www.sctp.org/mozilla.tar.gz>
- RFC 3436 (TLS over SCTP)
Updated•18 years ago
|
Assignee: darin → nobody
QA Contact: benc → networking
Comment 6•16 years ago
|
||
Discussion of HTTP over SCTP now belongs to bug 486199.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 16 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•