Closed
Bug 236664
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
on Win32 checksetup.pl prints wrong install instructions for Perl modules
Categories
(Bugzilla :: Installation & Upgrading, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
Bugzilla 2.18
People
(Reporter: abenea, Assigned: abenea)
Details
(Whiteboard: [needed for Win32bz])
Attachments
(1 file, 3 obsolete files)
4.72 KB,
patch
|
goobix
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1) Opera 7.50 [en] Build Identifier: On Windows, checksetup.pl prints commands like perl -MCPAN -e'install "Date::Format"' instead of ppm install TimeDate Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce:
Updated•20 years ago
|
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Whiteboard: [needed for Win32bz]
Updated•20 years ago
|
Assignee: justdave → zach
Component: bugzilla.org → Installation & Upgrading
Comment 1•20 years ago
|
||
Andrei: bugzilla.org is used for bugs related to the bugzilla.org website. :)
Assignee: zach → abenea
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•20 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Attachment #143177 -
Flags: review?(vlad)
Comment 3•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 143177 [details] [diff] [review] v1 +my %ppm_modules = ( Well I guess that works too, although we could have added them in the $modules variable. + return "ppm install " . $module; + } else { Do we need the "else" here? The "if" branch already exited until now. + if ($^O !~ /MSWin32/i) { ... + } else { + print "If you want to see pretty HTML views of patches, you should "; + print "install the \nPatchReader module:\n"; + print "PatchReader: " . install_command("PatchReader") . "\n"; + } Why do we use the install_command in a Win32-only block? Shouldn't install_command be platform-independent by design? Couldn't we use PatchReader to display the install instructions for the Linux branch as well? r=vlad with those questions answered or addressed in version 2.
Attachment #143177 -
Flags: review?(vlad) → review+
Comment 4•20 years ago
|
||
s/PatchReader/install_command/ (in the previous comment)
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•20 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #3) > (From update of attachment 143177 [details] [diff] [review]) > +my %ppm_modules = ( > > Well I guess that works too, although we could have added them in the $modules > variable. The $modules variable is for required packages, but we need to translate the optional packages also. > + return "ppm install " . $module; > + } else { > > Do we need the "else" here? The "if" branch already exited until now. Well, I thought it is more clear this way. > + if ($^O !~ /MSWin32/i) { > ... > + } else { > + print "If you want to see pretty HTML views of patches, you should "; > + print "install the \nPatchReader module:\n"; > + print "PatchReader: " . install_command("PatchReader") . "\n"; > + } > > Why do we use the install_command in a Win32-only block? Shouldn't > install_command be platform-independent by design? Couldn't we use PatchReader > to display the install instructions for the Linux branch as well? I'll switch to linux to see if perl -MCPAN works for PatchReader, and if it does I'll make another patch. > r=vlad with those questions answered or addressed in version 2. >
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•20 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #3) > > (From update of attachment 143177 [details] [diff] [review]) > I'll switch to linux to see if perl -MCPAN works for PatchReader, and if it does > I'll make another patch. I tried installing like this, but it doesn't work. I think I have answered all the questions.
Assignee | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Flags: approval?
Updated•20 years ago
|
Target Milestone: --- → Bugzilla 2.18
Comment 7•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 143177 [details] [diff] [review] v1 >+ print "Most ActivePerl modules are available at Apache ppm repository.\n"; This should be "at the Apache ppm repository" or "at Apache's ppm repository" >+ print "located at http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/perl/win32-bin/ppms/\n"; >+ print "You can add the repository with the following command:\n"; >+ print " ppm rep add apache http://apache.roweboat.net/perl/win32-bin/ppms/\n\n"; >+} I hadn't seen this one mentioned anywhere before... Can we post this to developers and get comments on whether this should be an officially recommended repository to use? >+ if ($^O !~ /MSWin32/i) { >+ print "If you want to see pretty HTML views of patches, you should "; >+ print "install the \nPatchReader module, which can be downloaded at:\n"; >+ print "http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/J/JK/JKEISER/PatchReader-0.9.2.tar.gz\n"; >+ print "When you get it, do the following to install:\n"; >+ print "tar xzvf PatchReader-0.9.2.tar.gz\n"; >+ print "cd PatchReader-0.9.2\n"; >+ print "perl Makefile.PL\n"; >+ print "make install\n\n"; PatchReader is available via CPAN now. We should fix this to use install_command like everything else.
Attachment #143177 -
Flags: review-
Updated•20 years ago
|
Flags: approval?
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•20 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #7) > (From update of attachment 143177 [details] [diff] [review]) > >+ print "Most ActivePerl modules are available at Apache ppm repository. \n"; > > This should be "at the Apache ppm repository" or "at Apache's ppm repository" > > >+ print "located at http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer. cgi/perl/win32-bin/ppms/\n"; > >+ print "You can add the repository with the following command:\n"; > >+ print " ppm rep add apache http://apache.roweboat. net/perl/win32-bin/ppms/\n\n"; > >+} > > I hadn't seen this one mentioned anywhere before... Can we post this to > developers and get comments on whether this should be an officially recommended > repository to use? I had a hard time finding the maintainer these modules. (I found the repository on google). It seems to be related to their Perl subproject. > > >+ if ($^O !~ /MSWin32/i) { > >+ print "If you want to see pretty HTML views of patches, you should "; > >+ print "install the \nPatchReader module, which can be downloaded at: \n"; > >+ print "http://search.cpan. org/CPAN/authors/id/J/JK/JKEISER/PatchReader-0.9.2.tar.gz\n"; > >+ print "When you get it, do the following to install:\n"; > >+ print "tar xzvf PatchReader-0.9.2.tar.gz\n"; > >+ print "cd PatchReader-0.9.2\n"; > >+ print "perl Makefile.PL\n"; > >+ print "make install\n\n"; > > PatchReader is available via CPAN now. We should fix this to use > install_command like everything else. > I tried perl -MCPAN -e'install "PatchReader"' but on my Mandrake 10 it says Going to read /root/.cpan/Metadata Database was generated on Thu, 02 Jan 2003 10:16:18 GMT Warning: Cannot install PatchReader, don't know what it is. Try the command i /PatchReader/ to find objects with matching identifiers.
Comment 9•20 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #8) > > I hadn't seen this one mentioned anywhere before... Can we post this to > > developers and get comments on whether this should be an officially > > recommended repository to use? > > I had a hard time finding the maintainer these modules. (I found the > repository on google). It seems to be related to their Perl subproject. Sorry, I wasn't clear enough. I meant the developers@bugzilla.org mailing list. This PPM repository isn't officially supported by ActiveState, thus we need some discussion on it before just blinding starting to recommend that people use it. > > PatchReader is available via CPAN now. We should fix this to use > > install_command like everything else. > > I tried > perl -MCPAN -e'install "PatchReader"' > but on my Mandrake 10 it says > Going to read /root/.cpan/Metadata > Database was generated on Thu, 02 Jan 2003 10:16:18 GMT ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Your CPAN database is WAY out of date. It's supposed to download a new one automatically if the current one is more than 24 hours old. I think your CPAN is broken.
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•20 years ago
|
||
Unix: PatchReader is handled through CPAN now. Windows: Changed the message explaining how to add a ppm repository.
Attachment #143177 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Attachment #143783 -
Flags: review?(vlad)
Comment 11•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 143783 [details] [diff] [review] v2 r=vlad assuming you got the green-light from justdave regarding the repository.
Attachment #143783 -
Flags: review?(vlad) → review+
Assignee | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Target Milestone: Bugzilla 2.18 → Bugzilla 2.20
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•20 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #7) > I hadn't seen this one mentioned anywhere before... Can we post this to > developers and get comments on whether this should be an officially recommended > repository to use? The suggested repository requires ActivePerl 5.8. So until someone finds a better repository or Bugzilla requires 5.8, the patch will sit here waiting to bitrot...
Assignee | ||
Comment 13•20 years ago
|
||
The recommended repository now dependends on the ActivePerl version.
Attachment #143783 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Attachment #143813 -
Flags: review?(vlad)
Comment 14•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 143813 [details] [diff] [review] v3 + print "The required ActivePerl modules are available OpenInteract's ppm repository.\n"; That doesn't make much sense in English. You could make that "are available at OpenInteract's". Probably you can make "The required" --> "Most" for consistency's sake as well, since you're at it. + print " ppm rep add oi http://openinteract.sourceforge.net/ppmpackages\n\n"; That URL returns a HTTP redirect code. Probably adding a slash at the end, like in Apache's case, will solve the issue. The patch looks good (except the English text mentioned at the beginning of this comment). You'll need justdave to approve the repository URLs.
Attachment #143813 -
Flags: review?(vlad) → review-
Assignee | ||
Comment 15•20 years ago
|
||
Attachment #143813 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Attachment #143822 -
Flags: review?(vlad)
Updated•20 years ago
|
Attachment #143822 -
Flags: review?(vlad) → review+
Updated•20 years ago
|
Target Milestone: Bugzilla 2.20 → Bugzilla 2.18
Comment 16•20 years ago
|
||
Looks good to me. :) People can feel free to complain later if the PPM repo is bad ;)
Flags: approval+
Comment 17•20 years ago
|
||
Checking in checksetup.pl; /cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/checksetup.pl,v <-- checksetup.pl new revision: 1.266; previous revision: 1.265 done
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•12 years ago
|
QA Contact: matty_is_a_geek → default-qa
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•