238887 - Browser freeze when javascript in page: navigator.mimeTypes['application/x-java-jnlp-file'];

Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 237947

(SeaMonkey :: General, defect)

Description

[Christian Peter]

User-Agent:       Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040326
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040326

Recent nightly builds fail with a site that contains this javascript. Other mime
types seem to work. I removed java and it is still there.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Open www.dkb.de
2. Klick "Internet Banking"
Actual Results:  
browser freeze

Expected Results:  
not to freeze? :)

Comment 1

[Christian Peter]

Attachment: Testcase HTML file

Comment 2

[Rene Pronk]

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040316

Works for me so perhaps it regressed somewhere between 03-16 and 03-26.

Comment 3

[Hermann Schwab]

wfm Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040326

opened testcase in a new tab, no freeze.

opened on original URL:
http://www.dkb.de/
http://www.dkb.de/ibanking/index.html
https://portal1.izb.de/ihb/dkb-bank/Main

Comment 4

[Christian Peter]

I downloaded older builds and verfied it came in between 2004-03-08 and 2004-03-09.

Comment 5

[Frank Wein [:mcsmurf]]

wfm current cvs trunk build on win2k

Comment 6

[Frank Wein [:mcsmurf]]

Christian: Can you give us the whole build string (after Build Id: in Browser
title), the two last digits are also important?

Comment 7

[Christian Peter]

mozilla-i686-pc-linux-gnu.tar.gz id: 2004030808 file size: 12984311 works

mozilla-i686-pc-linux-gnu.tar.gz id: 2004030908 file size: 12987356 does not
work. since then no one worked
                                                                               
              
uname -a
Linux else 2.6.4 #14 Thu Mar 11 07:25:16 CET 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux

Comment 8

[Christian :Biesinger (don't email me, ping me on IRC)]

(In reply to comment #5)
> wfm current cvs trunk build on win2k

yeah, that's because it's a linux-only bug.
there isn't that much need to repeatedly test a bug reported on linux on windows.

It did indeed regress 2004-03-08.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 237947 ***

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 237947 ***