Closed
Bug 239330
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 17 years ago
vsz and rss memory bloat when accessing that page (page size == 1Mb
Categories
(Core :: General, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 216418
People
(Reporter: richard_hubbe11, Unassigned)
References
()
Details
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040207 Firefox/0.8 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040207 Firefox/0.8 That page causes firefox to bloat and makes it unresponsive, might be paging to disk as it bloats. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.go to page 2. 3. Actual Results: That page causes firefox to bloat and makes it unresponsive, might be paging to disk as it bloats. Expected Results: quickly loaded the page with ease
Comment 1•20 years ago
|
||
Can confirm that bug with Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040423. The load time of the page was ~60s and the memory usage raised from 15MB to 180MB. For comparison, IE6 only needs ~15s and memory usage raises slightly from 10MB to 20 MB. I see that behaviour with disk cache and without disk cache. Bruno
Comment 2•20 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #1) Windows XP SP 1 running the Win32 version of Firefox 0.8 (downloaded from the mozilla.org website) on that page causes memory usage to go from 67MB to 217MB. Doing a "View Source" on the page and then scrolling down will sometimes cause CPU to jump to 80-90% for a few seconds. Other then that it doesn't seem to affect browser responsiveness (this machine is a 2-year old laptop with 768MB RAM, only 584MB in use). Nothing complex in the HTML either, one thing that I did notice is that the entire page is supposed to be enclosed in a < pre >< /pre > tag... but the page is missing the closing < /pre > and the entire content occurs *after* the closing of the body and html tags. Fixing the improper tags (adding a closing PRE at the end, moving the closing BODY/HTML tags also to the end of the document) and viewing the page again *still* causes memory usage to jump from 200MB to 361MB. That dropped to 234MB after I viewed the source. However, viewing page source and switching back and forth between the source window and Firefox 0.8 window doesn't exhibit the high CPU usage as the uncorrected page. Switching to a Win2000 server (latest service packs), same version of Firefox 0.8 but with blank profile, no extensions. Memory usage jumps from 16MB to 162MB with the *fixed* version of the page loaded from local disk. (Fixed meaning that the closing PRE was added, the BODY/HTML tags were moved to the bottom of the page.) Also tried removing the PRE tag entirely. Removing the < pre > tags from the document reduces memory usage to 73MB instead of 162MB.
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040727 Firefox/0.9.1+ Confirming behavior. Firefox shoots from about 25mb usage to 177mb. I have 512mb total. No hard disk swapping occurred. Not sure if this is a bug however..
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•20 years ago
|
||
Still occurs in 0.9.3. Does firefox use sbrk, mmap, malloc or ?? Perhaps the memory allocation/deallocation scheme needs to be scrutinized. If I can I will try to see if nay page faults are occurring. This may provide further insight into the problem.
Comment 5•19 years ago
|
||
probably a dupe of bug 112738
Comment 6•19 years ago
|
||
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 112738 ***
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Comment 7•19 years ago
|
||
The allocators used in the source are C malloc() and C++ new().
Comment 8•18 years ago
|
||
Why, exactly, was this marked duplicate? I don't think this is related to bug 112738 unless I missed something.
Comment 9•18 years ago
|
||
This bug needs triage for real.
Status: RESOLVED → UNCONFIRMED
Resolution: DUPLICATE → ---
Updated•18 years ago
|
Assignee: bross2 → nobody
QA Contact: general
Updated•17 years ago
|
Comment 10•17 years ago
|
||
knew I'd seen it somewhere else...duping
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago → 17 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•