241183 - achmea.nl - site looks awfull in Mozilla and Firefox

Status: RESOLVED FIXED

(Tech Evangelism Graveyard :: Dutch, defect, P2)

Description

[Peter Schram]

User-Agent:       Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040206 Firefox/0.8
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040206 Firefox/0.8

The site achmea.nl does open, but several items are layered on top of eachother
making the page unreadable. 

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. type url
2. press enter
3. observe total mess

Actual Results:  
Site renders and shows incorrectly as described in [details]

Expected Results:  
Render correctly

This could be related to bug 149081, which is a tech evangelism bug for site
www.averoachmea.nl. Both sites are connected as both brands (insurancy
companies) belong to the same Company: Achmea Group. Possibly the sites are made
by the same people/department/external-webdesigncompany?

Comment 1

[OstGote!]

Confirming Mozilla 1.8a build 2004042009 WinNT4

Comment 2

[Patrick]

Added URL to summary.
P=P2.
Confirming

Contacted them via their web site form.

Comment 3

[Martijn Wargers (dead)]

It seems like they use a lot of javascript to position the divs, which goes
horribly wrong in Mozilla:
http://www.achmea.nl/portal/ep/js/block.js

Comment 4

[Patrick]

Still a mess. No response from Achmea received. Seems typical for Achmea or
Achmea subsidaries.

Contacting them again.

Comment 5

[Patrick]

PS: note that the automated reply told me i could expect a reply from Achmea
before Wed 19 May, 1700h.

Comment 6

[Cyrille VIVION]

[bug248549notfixed]

Comment 7

[Erik Fabert]

*** Bug 281513 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 8

[Patrick]

Not fixed yet. Also, i never got the reply i was promised by Achmea...

Comment 9

[Thomas]

the link as provided in the URL box is no longer valid apparantly.

Comment 10

[Thomas]

Site still looks terrible (Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
rv:1.8b2) Gecko/20050514), I Contacted them via their web form.

Comment 11

[Patrick]

(In reply to comment #9)
> the link as provided in the URL box is no longer valid apparantly.

How do you mean? That page/site still exists, or isn't that what you mean?

Comment 12

[Thomas]

PS My comment #9 can be ignored that was an error.
Sorry

Comment 13

[Patrick]

Site has been redesigned [now seems to borrow a bit from Apple's Aqua theme] and works with latest nightly --> fixed