Closed
Bug 245332
Opened 22 years ago
Closed 21 years ago
inline list-elements ignores width and displays nested block elements incorrect
Categories
(Core :: Layout: Block and Inline, defect)
Tracking
()
People
(Reporter: diquadrat, Unassigned)
References
()
Details
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1)
Build Identifier: Up to 1.7rc2
defined width of an inline-list-element is ignored
nested block-elements breaks the inline-flow of list-elements
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. define list-elements as inline
2.a. define width for a list-element
2.b. nest a blockelement within a list-element
Actual Results:
2.a. width is ignored
2.b. the nested block-element breaks the inline-flow of list-elements
Expected Results:
look at the images in the demo-page (URL above)
or with MS Internetexplorer 6.0 (sp1)
Comment 1•22 years ago
|
||
Width only applies to block elements, so it should be ignored on inline elements.
The other test looks right to me too. Why are you expecting a block element to
not line-break?
Bug appears invalid....
Comment 2•22 years ago
|
||
Internet Explorer 6 itself renders the page very similar to Mozilla when you
change the doctype to strict HTML4 and force it into standards compliant mode.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 3•22 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #1)
> Width only applies to block elements, so it should be ignored on inline
elements.
> The other test looks right to me too. Why are you expecting a block element
to
> not line-break?
I expect that a block element do a line-break with other elements at the same
level, but i'm not expecting a line-break to his parent element.
e.g.: a div nested in a other div don't make a line break within its parent
div - why should this be different if the parent element is inline?
Comment 4•22 years ago
|
||
> e.g.: a div nested in a other div don't make a line break within its parent
> div
Actually, it does. Try it.
This bug is invalid -- our rendering is correct per CSS2.1.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 22 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Updated•21 years ago
|
Status: RESOLVED → UNCONFIRMED
Resolution: INVALID → ---
Comment 5•21 years ago
|
||
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 50626 ***
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 22 years ago → 21 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•