Closed Bug 249662 Opened 20 years ago Closed 20 years ago

duplicate copies of the same e-mail notification sent

Categories

(Bugzilla :: Email Notifications, defect)

x86
Windows XP
defect
Not set
minor

Tracking

()

RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 234159

People

(Reporter: eyalroz1, Assigned: justdave)

Details

User-Agent:       Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8a2) Gecko/20040626
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8a2) Gecko/20040626

I got the following two copies of the same notification. I am pretty sure the
problem is with bugzilla, not my e-mail setup, since I get a lot of mail, both
from bugzilla and other sources, and I have not observed this phenomenon with it.

copy 1:


From - Sat Jul 03 09:49:31 2004
X-Account-Key: account6
X-UIDL: 4061b62a00000288
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
Return-Path: <apache@mecha.mozilla.org>
X-Original-To: eyalroz@technion.ac.il
Delivered-To: eyalroz@technion.ac.il
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by techunix.technion.ac.il (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DB883574
	for <eyalroz@technion.ac.il>; Sat,  3 Jul 2004 05:42:02 +0300 (IDT)
	(envelope-from apache@mecha.mozilla.org)
Received: from techunix.technion.ac.il ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (techunix.technion.ac.il [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with LMTP id 21247-01 for <eyalroz@technion.ac.il>;
 Sat,  3 Jul 2004 05:42:02 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from mailgw1.technion.ac.il (mailgw1.technion.ac.il [132.68.238.34])
	by techunix.technion.ac.il (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73BEB359D
	for <eyalroz@technion.ac.il>; Sat,  3 Jul 2004 05:21:45 +0300 (IDT)
	(envelope-from apache@mecha.mozilla.org)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by mailgw1.technion.ac.il (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64B61FFBB2
	for <eyalroz@technion.ac.il>; Sat,  3 Jul 2004 05:21:45 +0300 (IDT)
	(envelope-from apache@mecha.mozilla.org)
Received: from mailgw1.technion.ac.il ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (mailgw1.technion.ac.il [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with LMTP id 15554-01-62 for <eyalroz@technion.ac.il>;
 Sat,  3 Jul 2004 05:21:45 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from mecha.mozilla.org (h-207-126-111-200-mozilla.sv.meer.net
[207.126.111.200])
	by mailgw1.technion.ac.il (Postfix) with ESMTP id D72FAFFBAD
	for <eyalroz@technion.ac.il>; Sat,  3 Jul 2004 05:21:43 +0300 (IDT)
	(envelope-from apache@mecha.mozilla.org)
Received: from mecha.mozilla.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by mecha.mozilla.org (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i632LZHi016990
	for <eyalroz@technion.ac.il>; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 19:21:35 -0700
Received: (from apache@localhost)
	by mecha.mozilla.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i632LZ0E016988;
	Fri, 2 Jul 2004 19:21:35 -0700
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 19:21:35 -0700
Message-Id: <200407030221.i632LZ0E016988@mecha.mozilla.org>
From: bugzilla-daemon@mozilla.org
To: eyalroz@technion.ac.il
Subject: [Bug 18574] restore support for MNG animation format and JNG image format
X-Bugzilla-Reason: Voter
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at technion.ac.il
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at technion.ac.il
Status:   

http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18574





------- Additional Comments From bouil@bouil.org  2004-07-02 03:23 PDT -------
As a basic user, i can't understand why you wonder about GIF patents. MNG is
simply better... So just implements it ! , or remove the PNG support too,
arguing that GIF can replace it and IE doesn't support PNG well !


------- Additional Comments From P.M.Weilbacher@durham.ac.uk  2004-07-02 04:02
PDT -------
Found the webpage again that I was referring to in comment #457:
http://entropymine.com/jason/testbed/pngtrans/
When the MNG decoder is used for PNGs, Mozilla displays the "RGB binary
transparency" and "Grayscale binary transparency" examples with a black background.

------- Additional Comments From netdragon@gmail.com  2004-07-02 19:18 PDT -------
Removing .png support, ignoring technical reasons, would be unfair to those who
have put work into making quality .png support in the browser. I also don't see
what we'd gain by dropping .png and we'd lose a lot since some skins and
websites use .png. Also, the .png code is not really that much of the code of
Mozilla since the image library abstracts a lot of the functionality shared
between all image decoders. 

Also, from what I've heard, there are CSS tricks to get alpha transparency to
work properly for IE in .png images if people have DirectX installed, which is
nearly everyone. These kind of CSS hacks are becoming more popular to fix IE
bugs on Websites, can be commented out using conditional comments, and are often
even given away as scripts for your website (such as IE7 on sourceforge -- which
doesn't yet afaik handle the .png transparency issue).


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email





copy 2:


From - Sat Jul 03 13:20:10 2004
X-Account-Key: account6
X-UIDL: 4061b62a0000029c
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
Return-Path: <apache@mecha.mozilla.org>
X-Original-To: eyalroz@technion.ac.il
Delivered-To: eyalroz@technion.ac.il
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by techunix.technion.ac.il (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CE2A351F
	for <eyalroz@technion.ac.il>; Sat,  3 Jul 2004 13:12:11 +0300 (IDT)
	(envelope-from apache@mecha.mozilla.org)
Received: from techunix.technion.ac.il ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (techunix.technion.ac.il [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with LMTP id 06390-01-3 for <eyalroz@technion.ac.il>;
 Sat,  3 Jul 2004 13:12:11 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from mailgw4.technion.ac.il (mailgw4.technion.ac.il [132.68.238.37])
	by techunix.technion.ac.il (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62CDF34F5
	for <eyalroz@technion.ac.il>; Sat,  3 Jul 2004 13:12:11 +0300 (IDT)
	(envelope-from apache@mecha.mozilla.org)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by mailgw4.technion.ac.il (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5507BF7921
	for <eyalroz@technion.ac.il>; Sat,  3 Jul 2004 13:12:11 +0300 (IDT)
	(envelope-from apache@mecha.mozilla.org)
Received: from mailgw4.technion.ac.il ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (mailgw4.technion.ac.il [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with LMTP id 10214-01-57 for <eyalroz@technion.ac.il>;
 Sat,  3 Jul 2004 13:12:11 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from mecha.mozilla.org (h-207-126-111-200-mozilla.sv.meer.net
[207.126.111.200])
	by mailgw4.technion.ac.il (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB36FF790C
	for <eyalroz@technion.ac.il>; Sat,  3 Jul 2004 13:12:10 +0300 (IDT)
	(envelope-from apache@mecha.mozilla.org)
Received: from mecha.mozilla.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by mecha.mozilla.org (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i63A6sHi011046
	for <eyalroz@technion.ac.il>; Sat, 3 Jul 2004 03:06:54 -0700
Received: (from apache@localhost)
	by mecha.mozilla.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i63A6she011044;
	Sat, 3 Jul 2004 03:06:54 -0700
Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2004 03:06:54 -0700
Message-Id: <200407031006.i63A6she011044@mecha.mozilla.org>
From: bugzilla-daemon@mozilla.org
To: eyalroz@technion.ac.il
Subject: [Bug 18574] restore support for MNG animation format and JNG image format
X-Bugzilla-Reason: Voter
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at technion.ac.il
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at technion.ac.il
Status:   

http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18574





------- Additional Comments From bouil@bouil.org  2004-07-02 03:23 PDT -------
As a basic user, i can't understand why you wonder about GIF patents. MNG is
simply better... So just implements it ! , or remove the PNG support too,
arguing that GIF can replace it and IE doesn't support PNG well !


------- Additional Comments From P.M.Weilbacher@durham.ac.uk  2004-07-02 04:02
PDT -------
Found the webpage again that I was referring to in comment #457:
http://entropymine.com/jason/testbed/pngtrans/
When the MNG decoder is used for PNGs, Mozilla displays the "RGB binary
transparency" and "Grayscale binary transparency" examples with a black background.

------- Additional Comments From netdragon@gmail.com  2004-07-02 19:18 PDT -------
Removing .png support, ignoring technical reasons, would be unfair to those who
have put work into making quality .png support in the browser. I also don't see
what we'd gain by dropping .png and we'd lose a lot since some skins and
websites use .png. Also, the .png code is not really that much of the code of
Mozilla since the image library abstracts a lot of the functionality shared
between all image decoders. 

Also, from what I've heard, there are CSS tricks to get alpha transparency to
work properly for IE in .png images if people have DirectX installed, which is
nearly everyone. These kind of CSS hacks are becoming more popular to fix IE
bugs on Websites, can be commented out using conditional comments, and are often
even given away as scripts for your website (such as IE7 on sourceforge -- which
doesn't yet afaik handle the .png transparency issue).


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email



Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
This is a side-effect of bug 2324159

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 234159 ***
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
QA Contact: matty_is_a_geek → default-qa
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.