Closed
Bug 251260
Opened 21 years ago
Closed 21 years ago
X10-style XBM images do not render properly
Categories
(Core :: Graphics: ImageLib, defect)
Core
Graphics: ImageLib
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: megabyte, Assigned: megabyte)
References
()
Details
Attachments
(2 files, 1 obsolete file)
2.93 KB,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review | |
3.10 KB,
patch
|
Biesinger
:
review-
tor
:
superreview-
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
XBM images using the X10-style C code (an array of shorts instead of the
X11-style array of chars) does not render properly because the values are always
assumed to be chars.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•21 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Updated•21 years ago
|
Attachment #153074 -
Flags: superreview?(dveditz)
Attachment #153074 -
Flags: review?(cbiesinger)
Comment 2•21 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 153074 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch
(hmm, that file needs more error checking...)
+ return NS_OK;
please add a comment like "Waiting for more data"
+ if(!mIsX10 || !hiByte)
style of this file is a space between if and '('
(3 times in this patch)
I'd like tor to sr this patch
Attachment #153074 -
Flags: superreview?(tor)
Attachment #153074 -
Flags: superreview?(dveditz)
Attachment #153074 -
Flags: review?(cbiesinger)
Attachment #153074 -
Flags: review+
Comment on attachment 153074 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch
>+ if(hiByte) pixel >>= 8;
Along with the changes biesi requested, split this into two lines.
sr=tor
Attachment #153074 -
Flags: superreview?(tor) → superreview+
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•21 years ago
|
||
I don't have CVS access, so somebody else will have to check this in...
Attachment #153074 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•21 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Updated•21 years ago
|
Attachment #153242 -
Flags: superreview?(tor)
Attachment #153242 -
Flags: review?(cbiesinger)
Comment on attachment 153242 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch for this and bug 251446
Do not combine changes. sr-
Attachment #153242 -
Flags: superreview?(tor) → superreview-
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•21 years ago
|
||
Sorry, I didn't think 2 lines warranted an entire extra patch...
Comment 8•21 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 153242 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch for this and bug 251446
yes, please make a new patch for that bug
Attachment #153242 -
Flags: review?(cbiesinger) → review-
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•21 years ago
|
||
tor or biesi, can you check in patch 153174?
Flags: blocking1.8a3?
Flags: blocking1.7.2?
Flags: blocking-aviary1.0RC1?
Updated•21 years ago
|
Flags: blocking-aviary1.0RC1? → blocking-aviary1.0RC1-
Comment 10•21 years ago
|
||
checked in, sorry for the delay :(
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 21 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•21 years ago
|
Flags: blocking1.8a3?
Updated•20 years ago
|
Flags: blocking1.7.5? → blocking1.7.5-
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•