Closed Bug 251775 Opened 21 years ago Closed 21 years ago

[FIX]Remove direct drag-drop knowledge from nsFrame::HandlePress

Categories

(Core :: Layout, defect, P1)

x86
Linux
defect

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
mozilla1.8alpha3

People

(Reporter: bzbarsky, Assigned: bzbarsky)

References

Details

Attachments

(1 file, 1 obsolete file)

Attached patch Proposed patch (obsolete) — Splinter Review
Comment on attachment 153466 [details] [diff] [review] Proposed patch biesi, jst, what do you think?
Attachment #153466 - Flags: superreview?(jst)
Attachment #153466 - Flags: review?(cbiesinger)
That patch fixes bug 244859 too.
Blocks: 244859
Priority: -- → P1
Summary: Remove direct drag-drop knowledge from nsFrame::HandlePress → [FIX]Remove direct drag-drop knowledge from nsFrame::HandlePress
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla1.8beta
Comment on attachment 153466 [details] [diff] [review] Proposed patch thanks! Index: content/base/public/nsContentUtils.h + * @return the nsIImage corresponding to the first frame of the image + */ + static nsresult GetImageFromContent(nsIImageLoadingContent* aContent, + nsIImage** aImage); + * @return whether it's draggable + */ + static PRBool ContentIsDraggable(nsIContent* aContent) { This is a bit inconsistent. the @return refers to two different things here... why not use something like: @param [out] in the first case?
> This is a bit inconsistent. the @return refers to two different things here... That seems to be the style of the file, basically...
Comment on attachment 153466 [details] [diff] [review] Proposed patch content/base/src/nsContentUtils.cpp + return CallGetInterface(ir.get(), aImage); is the .get() needed? + nsCOMPtr<nsIURI> absURI; what's this COMptr for? content/base/src/nsContentAreaDragDrop.cpp + NS_PRECONDITION(outParent, "Null out param?"); I kinda find these useless, but ok. void nsTransferableFactory::FindParentLinkNode(nsIDOMNode* inNode, nsIDOMNode** outParent) maybe this should return an already_AddRefed, instead of using an out param
Attachment #153466 - Flags: review?(cbiesinger) → review+
> is the .get() needed? Yes, if you want it to compile. > + nsCOMPtr<nsIURI> absURI; > what's this COMptr for? Oops. That's from an earlier patch iteration. Fixed. > maybe this should return an already_AddRefed, instead of using an out param Hmm.. yeah, I could do that. There're just a _lot_ of callsites...
Blocks: 252926
Comment on attachment 153466 [details] [diff] [review] Proposed patch - In content/base/public/nsContentUtils.h: + * Method to get an nsIImage from an image loading content + * + * @param aContent The image loading content. Must not be null. + * @return the nsIImage corresponding to the first frame of the image + */ + static nsresult GetImageFromContent(nsIImageLoadingContent* aContent, + nsIImage** aImage); Seems like this could return already_AddRefed(). sr=jst with that and the other comments addressed.
Attachment #153466 - Flags: superreview?(jst) → superreview+
Attachment #153466 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Fixed.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 21 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: mozilla1.8beta → mozilla1.8alpha3
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: