Closed
Bug 253447
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
VERY unhelpful error if user enters text in "blocks" field
Categories
(Bugzilla :: Creating/Changing Bugs, defect, P3)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
Bugzilla 2.18
People
(Reporter: bugreport, Assigned: bugreport)
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
1.86 KB,
patch
|
kiko
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
If a user is new to the system and does not realize that Blocks is a reference
to another bug number, the error message is no help at all.
The 'bug number' is invalid. It is neither a bug number nor an alias to a bug
number. If you are trying to use QuickSearch, you need to enable JavaScript in
your browser. To help us fix this limitation, add your comments to bug 70907.
Note: This came from investigation of data/errorlog after a user commented that
he could not open a bug.
Assignee | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Flags: blocking2.18?
Priority: -- → P3
Target Milestone: --- → Bugzilla 2.18
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•20 years ago
|
||
Either a third field in ValidateBugID with the field name or just echoing the
original text would do the trick.
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•20 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Assignee: myk → bugreport
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Assignee | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Attachment #154644 -
Flags: review?
Comment 3•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 154644 [details] [diff] [review]
Made less confusing
Two things:
- it's kinda weird weird to say bug number 'foo' given that foo isn't a
number. Should we instead be saying something like:
The bug identifier 'xxxx' is invalid.
or
The bug 'xxx' is invalid.
If this message is used both for numbers and for aliases, have you considered
splitting the error message into an alias-specific one?
Is the <em> a standard?
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•20 years ago
|
||
Attachment #154644 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Attachment #154713 -
Flags: review?
Updated•20 years ago
|
Attachment #154644 -
Flags: review?
Comment 5•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 154713 [details] [diff] [review]
plain wording
Maybe you want to use "identifier" instead of "number'. Maybe not.
Tired of pointing people to a silly bug?
Attachment #154713 -
Flags: review? → review+
Assignee | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Flags: approval?
Flags: approval2.18?
Comment 6•20 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #5)
> Tired of pointing people to a silly bug?
Hell yes. :)
Flags: blocking2.18?
Flags: approval?
Flags: approval2.18?
Flags: approval2.18+
Flags: approval+
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•20 years ago
|
||
checked in on both branches
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•12 years ago
|
QA Contact: matty_is_a_geek → default-qa
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•