Closed Bug 256017 Opened 21 years ago Closed 21 years ago

font-family style broken for Webdings, Wingdings and similar fonts

Categories

(Core :: Layout: Text and Fonts, defect)

1.7 Branch
x86
Windows XP
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 33127

People

(Reporter: dbeckham, Unassigned)

References

()

Details

User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040803 Firefox/0.8 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040803 Firefox/0.8 The Win32 build of FireFox 0.9.3 does not render text correctly when the following style has been applied: "font-family: Webdings;". The Mac OS build for the same version of FireFox renders the style correctly. Using the following snippit of HTML, you can see the problem: ---HTML SNIPPIT--- Win32 FireFox BAD <div style="font-family: Webdings;">45678</div> Win32 FireFox GOOD <font face="Webdings">45678</font> ---HTML SNIPPIT--- FireFox incorrectly displays the numbers 4 through 8 inside the DIV tag, but will correctly display the Webding glyphs inside the FONT tag. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Copy the html snippit given to a simple html page. 2. Load the html page in FireFox. 3. Witness the incorrect behavior. Actual Results: You see incorrectly rendered text inside the DIV tag, but correctly rendered text inside the FONT tag. Expected Results: FireFox should have correctly rendered the Webdings glyphs inside the DIV tag with the "font-family" style applied. Please note that the HTML snippit is rendered correctly on the Mac OS platform using the same version of FireFox. I have not been able to verify whether or not the snippit is rendered correctly in Linux/Unix.
Assignee: firefox → nobody
Component: General → Layout: Fonts and Text
Product: Firefox → Browser
QA Contact: firefox.general → core.layout.fonts-and-text
Version: unspecified → 1.7 Branch
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 33127 ***
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 21 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Bug 193404 sounds closer? (Reporter, see also its comment 4 for some info on properly accessing the elements of symbol fonts.)
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.