264643 - tools/make-news.pl, tools/bug-feed-rss1.tmpl

Status: VERIFIED FIXED

(www.mozilla.org :: General, defect)

Description

[victory <[e-mail]>]

User-Agent:       Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040913 Firefox/0.10.1
Build Identifier: 

rdf:li resource -> rdf:li rdf:resource

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:

Comment 1

[victory <[e-mail]>]

Attachment: this makes your rdf valid

Comment 2

[David Baron :dbaron: (⌚️UTC-4, no longer working on Mozilla)]

http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-rdf-syntax-19990222/ and
http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-syntax-grammar-20040210/ seem to disagree on
this point, at least in their examples (and the latter in seemingly-normative
text).  They could be thought of as making sense either way, but they're
semantically quite different -- I generally don't like having namespaced
attributes as required attributes for a given element, but in this case the
attributes are valid on elements in other namespaces as well.

So the change is probably correct, and I've seen RSS done both ways.  (Why
hasn't anyone written an RSS validator that checks these things?)

Comment 3

[victory <[e-mail]>]

http://www.w3.org/RDF/Validator/ says:
Warning: {W101} Unqualified use of rdf:resource has been deprecated.

Comment 4

[David Baron :dbaron: (⌚️UTC-4, no longer working on Mozilla)]

Checked in.  Thanks for the patch.  The website should update within a few minutes.