Closed
Bug 266667
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
keyword search should not escape strings inputed into unicode
Categories
(Firefox :: General, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 258223
People
(Reporter: sekundes, Assigned: bugzilla)
References
Details
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041001 Firefox/0.10.1
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041001 Firefox/0.10.1
In 1.0PR, it does not escape the strings inputed into unicode so that the
location bar.
However, it does in 1.0RC1.
It makes many websites(e.g. CJK sites) which does not accept non-unicode strings
do not work.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. add this URL(http://google.com.hk/search?q=%s&ie=Big5&oe=UTF-8) as keyword
search which only accept Big5 encoding.
2. change the system locale to Big5 encoding.
3. use this keyword search with string "中文" via location bar.
Actual Results:
It lists results of "銝剜 ".(due to "中文" has been escaped as unicode before
forward the URL)
Expected Results:
It should list results of "中文".
Comment 2•20 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 266669 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3•20 years ago
|
||
> add this URL(http://google.com.hk/search?q=%s&ie=Big5&oe=UTF-8) as keyword
Why on earth do you want to do this? There's ABSOLUTELY NO reason to set the
above when
'http://google.com.hk/search?q=%s&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8' work perfectly well.
However, for 'local search engines' that don't understand UTF-8, we need a way
to specify the character encoding to use. That's bug 258223.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 258223 ***
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
OS: Windows 2000 → All
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
(In reply to comment #3)
> > add this URL(http://google.com.hk/search?q=%s&ie=Big5&oe=UTF-8) as keyword
>
> Why on earth do you want to do this? There's ABSOLUTELY NO reason to set the
> above when
> 'http://google.com.hk/search?q=%s&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8' work perfectly well.
> However, for 'local search engines' that don't understand UTF-8, we need a way
> to specify the character encoding to use. That's bug 258223.
>
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 258223 ***
I just want to make an example that accept Big5 encoding strings only.
I have lots of keyword search like this.
However, I want to know why it was change since 1.0PR?
This works different between 1.0PR and 1.0RC1.
Comment 5•20 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #4)
> I just want to make an example that accept Big5 encoding strings only.
> I have lots of keyword search like this.
That's what bug 258223 is for.
> However, I want to know why it was change since 1.0PR?
> This works different between 1.0PR and 1.0RC1.
What change are you talking about? It's always been like this afaik.
Comment 6•20 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #5)
> > However, I want to know why it was change since 1.0PR?
> > This works different between 1.0PR and 1.0RC1.
>
> What change are you talking about? It's always been like this afaik.
Sorry. You're right. I forgot what I wrote in bug 258223 comment #14:
> (currently, we always conver to the platform encoding)
It seems like one of firefox peers checked in the equivalent of attachment
158088 [details] [diff] [review] without any review. I'll add more comment to bug 258223
Comment 7•20 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #6)
> It seems like one of firefox peers checked in the equivalent of attachment
> 158088 without any review. I'll add more comment to bug 258223
Indeed, it was (although it was reviewed). See
http://bonsai.mozilla.org/cvsview2.cgi?diff_mode=context&whitespace_mode=show&file=browser.js&branch=&root=/cvsroot&subdir=mozilla/browser/base/content&command=DIFF_FRAMESET&rev1=1.346&rev2=1.347
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•