Closed Bug 266667 Opened 20 years ago Closed 20 years ago

keyword search should not escape strings inputed into unicode

Categories

(Firefox :: General, defect)

x86
All
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 258223

People

(Reporter: sekundes, Assigned: bugzilla)

References

Details

User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041001 Firefox/0.10.1 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041001 Firefox/0.10.1 In 1.0PR, it does not escape the strings inputed into unicode so that the location bar. However, it does in 1.0RC1. It makes many websites(e.g. CJK sites) which does not accept non-unicode strings do not work. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. add this URL(http://google.com.hk/search?q=%s&ie=Big5&oe=UTF-8) as keyword search which only accept Big5 encoding. 2. change the system locale to Big5 encoding. 3. use this keyword search with string "中文" via location bar. Actual Results: It lists results of "銝剜 ".(due to "中文" has been escaped as unicode before forward the URL) Expected Results: It should list results of "中文".
Please use "UTF-8" encoding to view this page, thanks.
*** Bug 266669 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
> add this URL(http://google.com.hk/search?q=%s&ie=Big5&oe=UTF-8) as keyword Why on earth do you want to do this? There's ABSOLUTELY NO reason to set the above when 'http://google.com.hk/search?q=%s&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8' work perfectly well. However, for 'local search engines' that don't understand UTF-8, we need a way to specify the character encoding to use. That's bug 258223. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 258223 ***
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
OS: Windows 2000 → All
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
(In reply to comment #3) > > add this URL(http://google.com.hk/search?q=%s&ie=Big5&oe=UTF-8) as keyword > > Why on earth do you want to do this? There's ABSOLUTELY NO reason to set the > above when > 'http://google.com.hk/search?q=%s&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8' work perfectly well. > However, for 'local search engines' that don't understand UTF-8, we need a way > to specify the character encoding to use. That's bug 258223. > > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 258223 *** I just want to make an example that accept Big5 encoding strings only. I have lots of keyword search like this. However, I want to know why it was change since 1.0PR? This works different between 1.0PR and 1.0RC1.
(In reply to comment #4) > I just want to make an example that accept Big5 encoding strings only. > I have lots of keyword search like this. That's what bug 258223 is for. > However, I want to know why it was change since 1.0PR? > This works different between 1.0PR and 1.0RC1. What change are you talking about? It's always been like this afaik.
(In reply to comment #5) > > However, I want to know why it was change since 1.0PR? > > This works different between 1.0PR and 1.0RC1. > > What change are you talking about? It's always been like this afaik. Sorry. You're right. I forgot what I wrote in bug 258223 comment #14: > (currently, we always conver to the platform encoding) It seems like one of firefox peers checked in the equivalent of attachment 158088 [details] [diff] [review] without any review. I'll add more comment to bug 258223
(In reply to comment #6) > It seems like one of firefox peers checked in the equivalent of attachment > 158088 without any review. I'll add more comment to bug 258223 Indeed, it was (although it was reviewed). See http://bonsai.mozilla.org/cvsview2.cgi?diff_mode=context&whitespace_mode=show&file=browser.js&branch=&root=/cvsroot&subdir=mozilla/browser/base/content&command=DIFF_FRAMESET&rev1=1.346&rev2=1.347
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.