Closed
Bug 271747
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 18 years ago
Width in table cells in bottom row sometimes ignored
Categories
(Core :: Layout: Tables, defect)
Core
Layout: Tables
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: martijn.martijn, Unassigned)
References
()
Details
(Keywords: testcase)
Attachments
(5 files)
641 bytes,
text/html
|
Details | |
413 bytes,
text/html
|
Details | |
360 bytes,
text/html
|
Details | |
2.32 KB,
patch
|
dbaron
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
2.59 KB,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8a5) Gecko/20041124 Firefox/0.9.1+
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8a5) Gecko/20041124 Firefox/0.9.1+
The url sometimes doesn't look 'right'. It happens on first load
(shift->reload), and you notice it when you see a repeating of the same
background image (which should not happen).
See upcoming testcase. That testcase uses the Maciej/Hyatt hack (javascript).
Basically what happens with that testcase is that any width set on table cells
in the bottom table row don't apply.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•20 years ago
|
||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•18 years ago
|
||
Ok, this got fixed between 2006-12-07 and 2007-12-08, so fixed by the reflow branch landing.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 18 years ago
Depends on: reflow-refactor
Flags: in-testsuite?
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•18 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•18 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•18 years ago
|
||
Attachment #261155 -
Flags: review?(dbaron)
Comment on attachment 261155 [details] [diff] [review]
reftest diff
You might also want to do a second reference (and a second == line in the manifest) where the cells in both rows have width attributes on them. But r=dbaron either way.
Attachment #261155 -
Flags: review?(dbaron) → review+
Reporter | ||
Comment 7•17 years ago
|
||
Ok, done that in this diff. I'll check this in.
Reporter | ||
Comment 8•17 years ago
|
||
RCS file: /cvsroot/mozilla/layout/reftests/bugs/271747-1a.html,v
done
Checking in 271747-1a.html;
/cvsroot/mozilla/layout/reftests/bugs/271747-1a.html,v <-- 271747-1a.html
initial revision: 1.1
done
RCS file: /cvsroot/mozilla/layout/reftests/bugs/271747-1b.html,v
done
Checking in 271747-1b.html;
/cvsroot/mozilla/layout/reftests/bugs/271747-1b.html,v <-- 271747-1b.html
initial revision: 1.1
done
RCS file: /cvsroot/mozilla/layout/reftests/bugs/271747-1-ref.html,v
done
Checking in 271747-1-ref.html;
/cvsroot/mozilla/layout/reftests/bugs/271747-1-ref.html,v <-- 271747-1-ref.htm
l
initial revision: 1.1
done
Checking in reftest.list;
/cvsroot/mozilla/layout/reftests/bugs/reftest.list,v <-- reftest.list
new revision: 1.289; previous revision: 1.288
done
Reftests checked in.
Flags: in-testsuite? → in-testsuite+
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•