User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616 The "Loaded Scripts" pane shows twisties (I guess one twisty per open file?), but no text (like filenames, function names, etc). Doublechlicking a twisty or one of its children opens a file in the "Source Code" pane. However, setting a breakpoint in that file creates a similar behavior in the "Breakpoints" pane. You can see the twisty, but no text. Setting watches in the "Watches" pane has similar problems. You can highlight the watch, but there is not text. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3.
Care to give us some /useful/ information? Where did you get version 0.9.83 from? What are you installing it into? If you're using the special Firefix 1.0 branch version in trunk Moz/FF this is expected. The same goes for using a trunk version in the Firefox 1.0 branch.
The same goes for the Mozilla 1.7 branch, btw.
ah ha. I'm using Mozilla 1.7. I got the download from http://www.hacksrus.com/~ginda/venkman/ . It warned about firefox, but not about Mozilla 1.7.
rginda, where did you get the 0.9.83 XPI from for the http://www.hacksrus.com/~ginda/venkman/ page? Hm, looks like it really is a trunk Mozilla one. Also, it needs to be pointed out that the 0.9.84 version will NOT work in trunk Firefox (which will become FF 1.1) because it will have exactly the problems described in this bug. Basically, (of the versions from hacksrus.com) 0.9.83 will only work in trunk Mozilla (post-1.7), and 0.9.84 will work in Firefox 1.0 and Mozilla 1.7 ONLY (not any other versions). Sean McMurray, since you have Moz 1.7, I suggest you try 0.9.84 as I believe that version will work. We do need to fix the problem that 1.7/1.0 is not compatible with trunk. I believe the only bit that is broken is tree-utils.js.
Yeah, I pulled it from a trunk tarball, I think.
Summarizing, there is no working version for the current Firefox trunk builds (?). If so, and since i get the same thing - as predicted in Comment #4 - with Venkman 0.9.84 in... Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8a6) Gecko/20041214 Firefox/1.0+ ..., i'd suggest widening title, summary, OS, and version.
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.8a6) Gecko/20041215 Firefox/1.0+ (Trunk build using standard methods) If Venkman works at all on the Mac, and since I am seeing the same as comment 4 , I am hopeful; which version do I want. The http://www.hacksrus.com/~ginda/venkman/ page has "Revision 0.9.84 is the FIREFOX ONLY build of Venkman. It will only work on Firefox. Other versions of Venkman will probably NOT work on Firefox. If you're not using Firefox, you should install 0.9.83 instead", and I suspect that many people would choose 0.9.84 from this instruction.
(In reply to comment #7) > Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.8a6) Gecko/20041215 > Firefox/1.0+ > > (Trunk build using standard methods) You are using a trunk Firefox nightly. There is no version of Venkman for this. (Mac should have no difference, all versions should work equally across all platforms)
Thank you. Am I right in thinking that the truth table for which versions are appropriate looks something like: -------------------------------------------- | Firefox | Suite | Gecko | Version | -------+---------+--------+-------+--------- Branch | 0.9.84 | 0.9.83 | 1.7 | 1.0 | Trunk | None | 0.9.83 | 1.8a6 | 1.0+ | -------------------------------------------- Comment 4 suggests that 0.9.84 (also) should work in Suite 1.7/1.0, but most other info is thst 0.9.84 is Firefox only. Is there anything that a contributor can do to accelerate the development of a Firefox trunk Venkmann version such as the one that Comment 1 hints at (I assume that there will be one)?
I've updated the Venkman development page to reflect the fact that Venkman doesn't work in the trunk.
0.9.84 must be used for the 1.7 branch.
This seems to be fixed with version 0.9.85. Can we resolve this bug?
Works fine on 20060325 trunk Venkman/Firefox for me. Marking WFM.