Closed
Bug 27860
Opened 25 years ago
Closed 25 years ago
Incorrect length/non-existence of bars over square roots (msqrt, mroot, radical)
Categories
(Core :: MathML, defect, P3)
Tracking
()
VERIFIED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: gartside, Assigned: rbs)
References
()
Details
Attachments
(5 files)
From Bug Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 [en-US] (Linux; I)
BuildID: 2000020310
The bars over square roots (used in place of brackets to group elements
together) is:
1) too short (in my opinion) for the square root of a single element
2) non-existent for the square root of a <mrow> of elements.
The url should make this clear.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.Go to url
2.
3.
Actual Results: Incorrect bar lengths over square roots
Expected Results: Put in the correct lengths! (Please)
Here is the complete code for the test page:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="mathml.css" type="text/css"?>
<!DOCTYPE html SYSTEM "mathml.dtd">
<html xmlns:math="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<title>Square Roots</title>
</head>
<body>
<p>
Square root of x times y. Bar does not cover enough of x.
</p>
<math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
<msqrt><mi>x</mi></msqrt><mo>.</mo><mi>y</mi>
</math>
<p>
Square root of (x times y). No bar at all (should cover both x and y).
</p>
<math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
<msqrt>
<mrow><mi>x</mi><mo>.</mo><mi>y</mi></mrow>
</msqrt>
</math>
</body>
</html>
Accepting bug - work to be done with the enabling of Part II of TeX rendering
rules.
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Part II of TeX rendering rules has landed. Testing on Win32 showed that the
sqrt is handled OK. After installing the TeX's CMSY10 and CMEX10 fonts on
your Linux box, do you still observe the problem reported in this bug?
Note: it is not clear to me that there should be a fall-back to draw the
branches of the sqrt explicitly in case the TeX fonts are not there. In
general, I am not convinced that there should be fall-back(s) when some
(freely-downloadable) fonts are missing in MathML. Otherwise, it will add
much work and complexity to the code.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 4•25 years ago
|
||
Unfortunately, your patch is not quite right for linux. Attachment follows.
The over bar covers what it should, but is very thick.
I think you are right about fonts.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 5•25 years ago
|
||
This rendering suggests that TeX fonts are not selected. (There
are some assumptions about the metrics of the sqrt char I get
a similar thick line if the Symbol font is used when the TeX is
expected). Have you updated mathml.css?
| Reporter | ||
Comment 7•25 years ago
|
||
| Reporter | ||
Comment 8•25 years ago
|
||
| Reporter | ||
Comment 9•25 years ago
|
||
I think the stretchy.xml and screenshot show what is happening.
1) square roots dont seem to be considered stretchy (no green background).
2) the `secret' pua codes are not rendered (only a `?')
3) DoubleUpArrow, DoubleRightArrow and left arrow (→) are recognised as
stretchy (green background). Left arrow is correctly stretched. But
DoubleUpArrow and DoubleRightArrow are not stretched.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 10•25 years ago
|
||
What about LongDoubleRightArrow ?
| Reporter | ||
Comment 11•25 years ago
|
||
| Reporter | ||
Comment 12•25 years ago
|
||
Below are the lines I added to test DoubleLongRightArrow. And the previous
attachment shows the result.
In summary: DoubleLRA is recognised as stretchy (green background) but is not
displayed ('?'). And is not stretched.
<p> Now for the last possible combination!!</p>
<p> DoubleLongRight arrow. Not recognised: `?'.
Green background. No stretching.</p>
<math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
<mover>
<mo>⟹</mo>
<mtext>Because</mtext>
</mover>
</math>
| Assignee | ||
Comment 13•25 years ago
|
||
All these symptoms are suggesting that TeX's fonts are not picked in your Linux
box. The '?' represent the glyphs that would have come from TeX fonts. And
consquently, if TeX's fonts are not picked, stretching of the glyphs whose parts
are TeX's fonts do not work.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 14•25 years ago
|
||
The fact that it is a font-selection problem is reinforced by the observation
that the code (on screenshot id7271) that is successfully stretching the
RightArrow (picked from the correctly installed Symbol font) is the same code
that would be used to stretch the other chars --if they were picked in the TeX
fonts. I guess there will be similar problems with the Mathematica fonts.
I have assigned PUA codes to UnderCurlyBracket, OverCurlyBracket,
UnderSquareBracket, OverSquareBracket, UnderParenthesis, OverParenthesis,
so that Linux will also have the Mathematica glyphs that are in MT Extra.
The correct stretching of the RightArrow means that the Symbol is setup
correctly. How is the Symbol font setup? Perhaps there is something
to be done in .Xdefaults to enable the other fonts in the browser?
| Assignee | ||
Comment 15•25 years ago
|
||
BTW, I left a piece of debug code in nsMathMLChar.cpp to tell when an
expected font is missing.
http://lxr.mozilla.org/seamonkey/source/layout/mathml/base/src/nsMathMLChar.cpp
372 else { // the font is not installed
373 #ifdef NS_DEBUG
374 char str[50];
375 localName.ToCString(str, sizeof(str));
376 printf("WARNING *** Missing the %s font to stretch MathML symbols!\n",
str);
377 printf(" Why don't you install the %s font on your system
for a better MathML experience!\n", str);
378 #endif
379 }
Temporarily commenting lines 373 & 378 in your optimized could confirm/deny
whether or not Mozilla is detecting the fonts.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 16•25 years ago
|
||
Roger, I commented out the debug ifdef - and your belief is confirmed. mozilla
doesnt see my tex fonts. Ideas? Anything I can do to help?
****Gfx Scrollbar Special case hit!!*****
in SetSecurityButton
nsXMLContentSink::AddDocTypeDecl
WARNING *** Missing the CMSY10 font to stretch MathML symbols!
Why don't you install the CMSY10 font on your system for a better
MathML experience!
WARNING *** Missing the CMEX10 font to stretch MathML symbols!
Why don't you install the CMEX10 font on your system for a better
MathML experience!
WARNING *** Missing the MT Extra font to stretch MathML symbols!
Why don't you install the MT Extra font on your system for a better
MathML experience!
failed to set the page title.
Document file:///home/paul/mozml/tests/stretchybug.xml loaded successfully
Document: Done (0.876 secs)
| Reporter | ||
Comment 17•25 years ago
|
||
I am feeling very pleased!! I've fixed my problem with getting mozilla to `see'
my tex fonts. And it isnt a mozilla problem.
It is a question of persuading X-windows to see the tex fonts. I've done this.
(Perhaps only temporarily.) When I work out what I did, I'll write it up.
It would still be interesting to know whether this is a problem for all linux
users, or just my set up.
...Now I am sad I `optimised' DynHieruni.xml to work with the fonts (Symbol) I
had. Stretchy union and intersection symbols, \preceq and quite a bit else are
*so* nice now!
| Assignee | ||
Comment 18•25 years ago
|
||
Marking the bug as fixed since the reporter is now satisfied with the solution
to the original problem of the bug.
The font problem that has now surfaced on Linux is to be covered by bug 35236
which shows that other people are experiencing the same problem.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 25 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 19•25 years ago
|
||
Rubber-stamping verified based on last two comments.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
| Assignee | ||
Comment 20•24 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 100550 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
| Assignee | ||
Comment 21•24 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 107749 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
| Assignee | ||
Comment 22•23 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 119855 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Summary: Incorrect length/non-existence of bars over square roots → Incorrect length/non-existence of bars over square roots (msqrt, mroot, radical)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 23•23 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 156291 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
| Assignee | ||
Comment 24•23 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 165430 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
| Assignee | ||
Comment 25•21 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 263937 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•