Closed Bug 280645 Opened 20 years ago Closed 20 years ago

JavaScript Scrolling Window overload 90% CPU on P4 2.4Mhz, Windows XP

Categories

(Firefox :: General, defect)

x86
Windows XP
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 137584

People

(Reporter: menachem, Assigned: bugzilla)

References

()

Details

User-Agent:       Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041107 Firefox/1.0
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041107 Firefox/1.0

on www.ynet.co.il, a hebrew site, FF occupied 90% of my CPU time measured on
task manager. Computer is P4 2.4Mhz, 512MB RAM Presario 2500 laptop.

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. http://www.ynet.co.il
2. Invoke Windows XP's Task Manager/Processes Tab
3. Click the CPU column twice to sort by CPU usage

Actual Results:  
Firefox process occupies 90% CPU on average

Expected Results:  
much less CPU time

Was verified by other users in the support forums.
i use custom made pc with geforce 4 440

256ram

2.4ghz p4 intel 845g chipset intel845grg board

same thing
menachem and Jay:
if you are webmaster of such site or if you can get in touch with the site
manager, then you can notify them of cross-browser and W3C compliant
alternatives for DHTML newsticker:

Cross-browser and web standard compliant Stock Ticker example
http://web.archive.org/web/20040202191024/http://devedge.netscape.com/toolbox/examples/2001/stock-ticker/

and

Comprehensive W3C web standard compliant alternative to <marquee>
http://web.archive.org/web/20040202065251/http://devedge.netscape.com/toolbox/examples/2002/xb/xbMarquee/

I checked the http://www.ynet.co.il page and the news ticker (DHTML marquee) is
the cause for the cpu overload. The page is also *_very poorly_* coded: 71 font
elements, 117 nested tables, 335 markup errors, lots of javascript functions and
overcrowded, loaded animations makes that page extremely demanding on user
system resources.

Resolving as DUPLICATE of bug 137584
  

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 137584 ***
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.