28217 - Input area for 2nd recipient's email address isn't in right location.

Status: VERIFIED DUPLICATE of bug 25103

(MailNews Core :: Composition, defect, P3)

Description

[ji]

Build: Linux 2000021708 commercial

On the mail compose window, the input area for the 2nd recipient's email address
is not in the right location.

Steps of reproduce:
1. Select Tasks | Mail to bring up messenger.
2. Click on New Msg to bring up the mail compose window.
3. Enter the first recipient's email address and hit Enter key.
   You'll see the input area for the 2nd recipient's email address jumps up to
    higher part of the window.

Comment 1

[Jean-Francois Ducarroz]

I have the same problem with Window NT and a debug build from this morning. 
Reassign to buster, cc'ing hyatt

Comment 2

[Jean-Francois Ducarroz]

it's a regression!

Comment 3

[ji]

Added "regression" in the summary.

Comment 4

[buster]

when did this last work correctly?

Comment 5

[Jean-Francois Ducarroz]

it was working yesterday with a debug build pulled around noon

Comment 6

[sol]

Nominating for Beta1.

Affects anyone who tries to enter more than one email address when addressing a 
mail message. High frequency, bad result.

Comment 7

[Charles Manske]

Could be a XUL issue - I'm examining it now.

Comment 8

[Charles Manske]

Note that after hitting enter and you type a 2nd (or nth) address in the 
missplaced widget, you can get it to go to the correct location by resizing the
window or simply mousing over the input widget.
David (or anyone else): In the JS, I follow into awAppendNewRow()
(in addressingWidgetOvlerlay.js), then asGetIntputElement is called. How is the 
ender widget placed in the new tree cell? That's where I would suspect the 
problem exists.

Comment 9

[Phil Peterson]

PDT+

Comment 10

[laurel]

*** Bug 28326 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 11

[laurel]

*** Bug 28326 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 12

[Kathleen :Brade]

shorten summary; this sounds a lot like bug #25103

Comment 13

[buster]

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 25103 ***

Comment 14

[ji]

Verified as a dup of 25103.