Closed
Bug 282680
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 19 years ago
Channel modes outside of RFC1459 not displayed in header
Categories
(Other Applications :: ChatZilla, defect)
Other Applications
ChatZilla
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: timeless, Assigned: Gijs)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug, )
Details
(Whiteboard: [cz-0.9.69.2])
Attachments
(1 file, 2 obsolete files)
|
11.09 KB,
patch
|
samuel
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
steps: 1. /sslserver irc.mozilla.org:6697 (or click the link) 2. /join #test [INFO] Channel view for “#test” opened. -->| YOU have joined #test 3. /mode #test +z =-= Mode #test +z by sslmonkey URL ircs://irc.mozilla.org:6697/test Mode +n Users 1, 1@, 0%, 0+ 4. /mode #test URL ircs://irc.mozilla.org:6697/test Mode +n Users 1, 1@, 0%, 0+ 5. /server irc.mozilla.org 6. /join #test [INFO] Channel view for “#test” opened. === #test Cannot join channel (+z) 7. openssl s_client -connect irc.mozilla.org:6697 :mecha.mozilla.org NOTICE AUTH :*** Looking up your hostname... nick probe PING :44510080 user probe probe probe probe pong :44510080 :probe MODE probe :+iz join #test :probe!probe@covad-mozilla.meer.net JOIN :#test mode #test :mecha.mozilla.org 324 probe #test +nz :mecha.mozilla.org 329 probe #test 1108716838 expected results for a channel like #test where ssl says the mode is +zn: URL ircs://irc.mozilla.org:6697/test Mode +zn Users 1, 1@, 0%, 0+ actual results: URL ircs://irc.mozilla.org:6697/test Mode +n Users 1, 1@, 0%, 0+
| Assignee | ||
Comment 1•20 years ago
|
||
SSL mode +z is not a universal IRC mode (the dancer-IRC server software, for example, uses it to define a special kind of 'moderated' mode). ChatZilla supports the modes described in RFC 1459, and doesn't actively do anything with the rest of them (as far as I know). I suppose you could ask for the mode string in the header to be updated at all times, using any mode that's listed in the supports reply, but this would not be a request specific for this mode. Try setting mode +V, or +S on moznet channels, and you'll notice they don't "work" either. Therefor, I think it may be better to change this bug to be a universal one for the mode display than one just for this specific mode, as it's a global 'problem'. Apart from that, we already have a bug for /mode, which even though it doesn't revolve around supporting modes *already* set on a channel, it does involve setting those modes in the first place. Whatever we do about either of these bugs, I think you would want to use the same approach for both in any case.
Comment 2•20 years ago
|
||
As Gijs says, this has nothing to do with SSL or +z. It has also been on my
Todo list for a while, since adding support for 005 RPL_ISUPPORTS, such that
this is actually possible.
The +z error message can be pretty-fied if someone can be arsed getting the
message number, and we're sure it doesn't conflict with anything. ("/pref
debugMode t", get message, "/pref debugMode -")Summary: ssl only mode +z isn't supported in chatzilla → Channels modes outside of RFC1459 not displayed in header
Updated•20 years ago
|
Assignee: rginda → silver
Updated•20 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Comment 3•19 years ago
|
||
It's just occured to me that I should test this on modes not in the 005 message... well, it works well for moznet with all sorts of odd modes. :)
Attachment #192508 -
Flags: review?(rginda)
Comment 4•19 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 192508 [details] [diff] [review] Parse MODE according to 005 message Whoops, please disregard the makexpi.sh changes and the __cz_suffix change. :)
Comment 5•19 years ago
|
||
+ // Add letters...
+ for (var t in { modeC: 0, modeD: 0 })
+ for (var m in this[t])
+ if (this[t][m])
+ str += m;
+
+ // Now add parameters.
+ for (var t in { modeC: 0 })
+ for (var m in this[t])
+ if (this[t][m])
+ str += " " + this[t][m];
That's pretty funky. Why are you enumerating object literals and not arrays?
And why have the second enumeration when you know it only contains "modeC".
Those four for loops should have braces, too, seeing as how they span multiple
lines.
It seems like it'd be easier to read if you looped over the modeC properties in
one loop and the the modeD properties in another. For the modeC propertiues,
you could append the parameters to a second string and combine the two at the end.
Updated•19 years ago
|
OS: Windows XP → All
Hardware: PC → All
| Assignee | ||
Comment 6•19 years ago
|
||
Rginda, could you please review this so it can hopefully land? Would bring us yet another bit closer to matching trunk with 0.9.68.5/6. :-)
Attachment #192508 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #196191 -
Flags: review?(rginda)
Comment 7•19 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 196191 [details] [diff] [review] Patch with rginda's nits fixed I've been hacking on a cross browser dhtml version of chatzilla at work, and one of the bit I'm hoping not for have to fork is irc.js. That means we'll need to avoid mozilla specific js in this file, which means no __define[GS]etter__.
Updated•19 years ago
|
Blocks: chatzilla1.0
| Assignee | ||
Comment 8•19 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 196191 [details] [diff] [review] Patch with rginda's nits fixed minused based on comment #7
Attachment #196191 -
Flags: review?(rginda) → review-
| Assignee | ||
Updated•19 years ago
|
Attachment #192508 -
Flags: review?(rginda)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 9•19 years ago
|
||
This patch uses a mapping object to see if a mode needs to change some kind of canonical e.channel.mode property as well. It's not as pretty as using getters / setters, but it should work on non-mozilla browsers if necessary.
Attachment #196191 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #202487 -
Flags: review?(rginda)
Updated•19 years ago
|
Assignee: silver → gijskruitbosch+bugs
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
| Assignee | ||
Updated•19 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Updated•19 years ago
|
Attachment #202487 -
Flags: review?(rginda) → review?(samuel)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 10•19 years ago
|
||
Samuel, any chance you could review this? :-)
Summary: Channels modes outside of RFC1459 not displayed in header → Channel modes outside of RFC1459 not displayed in header
Updated•19 years ago
|
Attachment #202487 -
Flags: review?(samuel) → review+
Comment 11•19 years ago
|
||
checked in --> FIXED.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•19 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [cz-0.9.69.2]
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•