Closed Bug 284710 Opened 20 years ago Closed 13 years ago

Javascript game present in the above mentioned URL does not work in Mozilla.

Categories

(Core :: DOM: Core & HTML, defect)

x86
Windows XP
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED INCOMPLETE

People

(Reporter: d_menashi, Unassigned)

References

()

Details

(Keywords: classic)

Attachments

(1 file)

User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041107 Firefox/1.0 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041107 Firefox/1.0 Hi, I am Dan Menashi. I have created a game and hosted it in my web site. It works in IE but does not work in Mozilla. Following is the link of the game. http://www.mywirelesskit.com/games-dec192003.html Thanks, Dan. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open Internet explorer and type the URL http://www.mywirelesskit.com/games-dec192003.html using IE. 2. Now open Mozilla and type the same URL. 3. One can see the difference which is the bug. Actual Results: I could see the difference between the working of IE and Mozilla for uploading Javascript games. Expected Results: The URL http://www.mywirelesskit.com/games-dec192003.html should work the same in IE and Mozilla.
Keywords: classic
confirming on firefox Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8b2) Gecko/20050302 Firefox/1.0+
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.8b2) Gecko/20050303 Kurt, it´s not a good idea to confirm a bug in Component: General, you should know where to put it. Hi Dan, looking at the start page, I´m seeing lots of CSS errors in JS console you can use http://validator.w3.org/ to check HTML, and http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/ to check CSS. http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mywirelesskit.com%2Fgames-dec192003.html&usermedium=all Javascript console of Firefox 1.0 doesn´t show CSS errors. 10x Error: Expected identifier for class selector but found '.'. Ruleset ignored due to bad selector. Source File: http://www.mywirelesskit.com/games-dec192003.html Line: 8 <style> ..bigcell { ..cell { ..hole { Try using one dot only ... 10x Error: Unknown property 'mso-bidi-font-size'. Declaration dropped. Source File: http://www.mywirelesskit.com/games-dec192003.html Line: 0 try using font-size 2x Warning: Element referenced by ID/NAME in the global scope. Use W3C standard document.getElementById() instead. Source File: http://www.mywirelesskit.com/games-dec192003.html Line: 909 Line: 553 selecting a level gives me three messages, then starting the game I get: Warning: Element referenced by ID/NAME in the global scope. Use W3C standard document.getElementById() instead. Source File: http://www.mywirelesskit.com/games-dec192003.html Line: 553 function getCell(row, col) { <- Line 553 return eval("a_" + row + "_" + col); } Warning: reference to undefined property getCell(t, ghcol).click Source File: http://www.mywirelesskit.com/games-dec192003.html Line: 873 Error: getCell(t, ghcol).click is not a function Source File: http://www.mywirelesskit.com/games-dec192003.html Line: 873 873: while (t == ghrow) t = r0(gsize); //skip holes getCell(t,ghcol).click(); I don´t know enough about JS to tell you what is wrong here, there is a famous JS debugger available for Firefox, Venkman http://www.mozilla.org/projects/venkman/venkman-walkthrough.html http://www.hacksrus.com/~ginda/venkman/
I'm pretty sure I didn't change this to NEW. I was just saying in my post that I can confirm this bug also on Firefox. Here is what the javascript console says about that page. Warning: Element referenced by ID/NAME in the global scope. Use W3C standard document.getElementById() instead. Source File: http://www.mywirelesskit.com/games-dec192003.html Line: 909 Warning: Element referenced by ID/NAME in the global scope. Use W3C standard document.getElementById() instead. Source File: http://www.mywirelesskit.com/games-dec192003.html Line: 553 (A bunch of these errors on many different lines) Error: Expected identifier for class selector but found '.'. Ruleset ignored due to bad selector. Source File: http://www.mywirelesskit.com/games-dec192003.html Line: 72 (bunch fo these on different lines also) Error: Unknown property 'mso-bidi-font-size'. Declaration dropped. Source File: http://www.mywirelesskit.com/games-dec192003.html Line: 0
> I'm pretty sure I didn't change this to NEW. You most certainly did -- see https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_activity.cgi?id=284710 The warnings are just that, warnings. Not fatal. What _is_ fatal is that when I click "start game" I get: Error: getCell(t, ghcol).click is not a function Source File: http://www.mywirelesskit.com/games-dec192003.html Line: 873 Dan, it looks like getCell() returns a <td> node. Why would this have a "click" method? I don't see you setting one in your JS anywhere.
Hi All, Thanks a lot for working on the bug I reported. I agree that my Javascript in the game is not that clean. But my point was if the game runs on IE then why it does not run in Firefox. In other words what can we do to run this game as it is in Firefox. We have to keep in mind that there may be thousands such games in internet which actually work in IE but would not work in Firefox. Dont you guys feel that this can hurt the popularity of Firefox. Atleast my game's users wont be inclined much to use Firefox for playing the game b'cos the game does not work there. Bottomline is we have to make Firefox as simple as possible so that it takes in bad code as well as IE takes in. Thanks, Dan.
> In other words what can we do to run this game as it is in Firefox. I can't tell _why_ this game works in IE. It looks like you're calling click() on a table cell. Does IE allow calling click() on any element in the DOM?
Ah. Dan, that's your answer. The game in question is using an IE-proprietary method instead of using the standard DOM way of dispatching click events. If this method is very widely used it may be worth implementing, but it doesn't seem to be.
This implements click() on all elements, seems like this is probably worth it.
Attachment #176950 - Flags: superreview?(bzbarsky)
Attachment #176950 - Flags: review?(bzbarsky)
... based on talking to Bob, that is.
Comment on attachment 176950 [details] [diff] [review] Implement click() on all HTML elements. If Bob says this is used... >Index: dom/public/idl/html/nsIDOMNSHTMLElement.idl >+ void click(); Document that this sends a left-click event, with all modifiers set to false? >Index: content/html/content/src/nsGenericHTMLElement.cpp >+NS_IMETHODIMP >+nsGenericHTMLElement::Click() >+{ Do we need to worry about people calling this from the onclick handler? >+ if (context) { >+ nsEventStatus status = nsEventStatus_eIgnore; >+ nsMouseEvent event(NS_MOUSE_LEFT_CLICK); >+ >+ HandleDOMEvent(context, &event, nsnull, NS_EVENT_FLAG_INIT, &status); Hmm... want to make nsGenericHTMLElement::DispatchClickEvent deal with lack of an aSourceEvent and use that here? That'll make the presshell aware that we're handling an event and all.... You want PR_FALSE for aFullDispatch, if you do that.
Comment on attachment 176950 [details] [diff] [review] Implement click() on all HTML elements. r- to get attention for review comments....
Attachment #176950 - Flags: superreview?(bzbarsky)
Attachment #176950 - Flags: superreview-
Attachment #176950 - Flags: review?(bzbarsky)
Attachment #176950 - Flags: review-
Hi All, Thanks a lot for creating this patch. Please let me know as to when this patch would be implemented. I am eagerly waiting to try my game http://www.mywirelesskit.com/games-dec192003.html in the Firefox browser. Thanks, Dan
Looking at the patch, why do the two existing click() implementations prevent recursion, but not the new one? Seems like we'd want to just prevent clicks from being recursive in general? Or...? What does IE do? What should the WHATWG spec say?
Component: General → DOM: HTML
Product: Mozilla Application Suite → Core
Version: unspecified → Trunk
Component: DOM: HTML → DOM: Core & HTML
QA Contact: general → general
Is this a wontfix ?
Assignee: general → nobody
Given that the game is gone, lets go with incomplete.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago
Resolution: --- → INCOMPLETE
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: